From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] BLOCK: Make it possible to disable the block layer [try #2] Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2006 12:51:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20060829115138.GA32714@infradead.org> References: <20060825142753.GK10659@infradead.org> <20060824213252.21323.18226.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <20060824213334.21323.76323.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> <10117.1156522985@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:61921 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964951AbWH2Lv4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Aug 2006 07:51:56 -0400 To: David Howells Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <10117.1156522985@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 05:23:05PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > > > config USB_STORAGE > > > tristate "USB Mass Storage support" > > > - depends on USB > > > + depends on USB && BLOCK > > > > ditto. > > ditto? Same as above. USB_STORAGE already selects scsi so it shouldn't need to depend on block.