From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Willy Tarreau Subject: Re: bogofilter ate 3/5 Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 07:00:44 +0200 Message-ID: <20060906050044.GC604@1wt.eu> References: <20060905235732.29630.3950.sendpatchset@tetsuo.zabbo.net> <44FE5019.6010404@oracle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from 1wt.eu ([62.212.114.60]:10258 "EHLO 1wt.eu") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932088AbWIFFAv (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Sep 2006 01:00:51 -0400 To: Zach Brown Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44FE5019.6010404@oracle.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 09:35:37PM -0700, Zach Brown wrote: > > There was a 3/5 but the bogofilter decided it was spam. It made it into > the linux-aio archive: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-aio&m=115750084710650&w=2 > > What should I have done to avoid the spam regexes and what should I do > now that I have a patch that makes them angry? I don't know. IMHO, bogofilter should only add a header so that people who want to filter can and those who don't want to will get all the messages. Spam has never been a real problem for me on LKML, but loss of messages and patches will certainly be. I would rather have the choice to not filter anything :-/ Willy