linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Chris Wedgwood <cw@f00f.org>
To: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	aviro@redhat.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 64-bit inode number issues
Date: Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:02:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061017060254.GA30598@tuatara.stupidest.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061012183232.GG4141@kvack.org>

On Thu, Oct 12, 2006 at 02:32:32PM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote:

> The only real way to get any exercising of the relevant code paths
> would be to fake 64 bit inode numbers in a commonly used filesystem
> like ext3.

Why not add a config option (or boot-time flash) or even mount option
to have *existing* inode numbers shifted up 32-bits so that any
userspace breakage will be detected really early on?

  reply	other threads:[~2006-10-17  6:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-09-28 16:45 fscache review comments, part 1 Christoph Hellwig
2006-09-28 17:30 ` Andreas Dilger
2006-09-29  0:02   ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-09-29  1:51     ` Timothy Shimmin
2006-09-29  8:38 ` David Howells
2006-10-02 13:40 ` David Howells
2006-10-02 17:39   ` Andrew Morton
2006-10-02 21:41     ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-04 13:44 ` Al Viro
2006-10-04 14:18 ` 64-bit inode number issues David Howells
2006-10-07 21:01   ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-10-09  9:01     ` David Chinner
2006-10-09 11:32     ` David Howells
2006-10-09 14:12       ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-10-09 23:53       ` David Chinner
2006-10-12 18:32     ` Benjamin LaHaise
2006-10-17  6:02       ` Chris Wedgwood [this message]
2006-10-09  7:58   ` David Howells
2006-10-04 14:23 ` David Howells
2006-10-08  2:00   ` Theodore Tso
2006-10-08 16:02     ` Alexander Viro
2006-10-09 13:46 ` fscache review comments, part 1 David Howells
2006-10-10 13:31   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061017060254.GA30598@tuatara.stupidest.org \
    --to=cw@f00f.org \
    --cc=akpm@osdl.org \
    --cc=aviro@redhat.com \
    --cc=bcrl@kvack.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).