linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@ucw.cz>
To: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
Cc: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Defragmentation interface
Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2006 20:38:00 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20061103193800.GD17306@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20061103192216.GA5252@schatzie.adilger.int>

> On Nov 03, 2006  15:30 +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > > - stripe unit and stripe width need to be exposed so defrag too
> > >   can make correct placement decisions.
> >   fs-specific thing...
> 
> I think this is not just XFS-specific.  It is very desirable to align
> large IO to the RAID stripe so that if you write stripe_width bytes
> you don't do 2 expensive read-modify-write steps, but rather a single
> write operation.  Also RAID controllers have (large) internal cache
> "lines" and having aligned reads can help noticably, and also if array
> is doing RAID parity checking to avoid overhead of doing this for two
> stripes instead of one.
  I see, thanks for information. On the other hand this is rather an
underlying block device feature than a fs thing, isn't it? So does it
make sence to pass this information via fs interface?

								Honza

  reply	other threads:[~2006-11-03 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-02 14:39 [RFC] Defragmentation interface Jan Kara
2006-11-02 22:59 ` David Chinner
2006-11-03 14:30   ` Jan Kara
2006-11-03 19:22     ` Andreas Dilger
2006-11-03 19:38       ` Jan Kara [this message]
2006-11-06  2:54     ` David Chinner
2006-11-06 17:44       ` Jan Kara
2006-11-07  3:03         ` David Chinner
2006-11-03 14:50   ` Dave Kleikamp

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20061103193800.GD17306@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz \
    --to=jack@ucw.cz \
    --cc=adilger@clusterfs.com \
    --cc=dgc@sgi.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).