From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: NFSv4/pNFS possible POSIX I/O API standards Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2006 10:02:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20061205100255.GA5871@infradead.org> References: <6.2.3.4.2.20061127213243.04f786c0@cic-mail.lanl.gov> <20061128055428.GA29891@infradead.org> <20061129090450.GA16296@infradead.org> <20061129122313.GG14315@parisc-linux.org> <20061129123913.GA15994@infradead.org> <4570ACD1.7060800@mcs.anl.gov> <4574BF52.6090600@mcs.anl.gov> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Latchesar Ionkov , Christoph Hellwig , Matthew Wilcox , Gary Grider , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:54851 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S967579AbWLEKDH (ORCPT ); Tue, 5 Dec 2006 05:03:07 -0500 To: Rob Ross Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4574BF52.6090600@mcs.anl.gov> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 06:37:38PM -0600, Rob Ross wrote: > I think the subject line might be a little misleading; we're not just > talking about NFS here. There are a number of different file systems > that might benefit from these enhancements (e.g. GPFS, Lustre, PVFS, > PanFS, etc.). Any support for advance filesystem semantics will definitly not be available to propritary filesystems like GPFS that violate our copyrights blatantly.