From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jens Axboe Subject: Re: [PATCHSET 1][PATCH 0/6] Filesystem AIO read/write Date: Thu, 4 Jan 2007 18:49:38 +0100 Message-ID: <20070104174938.GI11203@kernel.dk> References: <20061227153855.GA25898@in.ibm.com> <20061228082308.GA4476@in.ibm.com> <20070103141556.82db0e81.akpm@osdl.org> <20070104045621.GA8353@in.ibm.com> <20070104090242.44dd8165.akpm@osdl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: suparna@in.ibm.com, linux-aio@kvack.org, drepper@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jakub@redhat.com, mingo@elte.hu Return-path: Received: from brick.kernel.dk ([62.242.22.158]:20016 "EHLO kernel.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932122AbXADRtW (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jan 2007 12:49:22 -0500 To: Andrew Morton Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070104090242.44dd8165.akpm@osdl.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 04 2007, Andrew Morton wrote: > > Please let know how you want this fixed up. > > > > >From what I can tell the comments in the unplug patches seem to say that > > it needs more work and testing, so perhaps a separate fixup patch may be > > a better idea rather than make the fsaio patchset dependent on this. > > Patches against next -mm would be appreciated, please. Sorry about that. > > I _assume_ Jens is targetting 2.6.21? Only if everything works perfectly, 2.6.22 is also a viable target. -- Jens Axboe