From: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
To: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Filesystems <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/9] fs: libfs buffered write leak fix
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2007 17:58:01 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070202175801.3f97f79b.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070203013316.GB27300@wotan.suse.de>
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 02:33:16 +0100
Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
> > > ===================================================================
> > > --- linux-2.6.orig/fs/buffer.c
> > > +++ linux-2.6/fs/buffer.c
> > > @@ -2344,6 +2344,8 @@ int nobh_prepare_write(struct page *page
> > >
> > > if (is_mapped_to_disk)
> > > SetPageMappedToDisk(page);
> > > +
> > > + /* XXX: information leak vs read(2) */
> > > SetPageUptodate(page);
> > >
> > > /*
> >
> > That comment is too terse to be useful.
>
> OK, similar problem here - we have brought all the buffers uptodate
> that we are *not* going to write over, or partially write over, but
> we can have an uninitialised hole over the region we want to write.
>
> I think just setting page uptodate in commit_write might do the
> trick? (and getting rid of the set_page_dirty there).
Yes, the page just isn't uptodate yet in prepare_write() - moving things
to commti_write() sounds sane.
But please, can we have sufficient changelogs and comments in the next version?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-03 1:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-01-29 10:31 [patch 0/9] buffered write deadlock fix Nick Piggin
2007-01-29 10:31 ` [patch 1/9] fs: libfs buffered write leak fix Nick Piggin
2007-02-02 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03 1:33 ` Nick Piggin
2007-02-03 1:58 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-02-03 2:09 ` Nick Piggin
2007-02-03 2:19 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03 2:28 ` Nick Piggin
2007-02-03 17:49 ` Jörn Engel
2007-02-04 3:55 ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-29 10:31 ` [patch 2/9] mm: revert "generic_file_buffered_write(): handle zero length iovec segments" Nick Piggin
2007-01-29 10:32 ` [patch 3/9] mm: revert "generic_file_buffered_write(): deadlock on vectored write" Nick Piggin
2007-01-29 10:32 ` [patch 4/9] mm: generic_file_buffered_write cleanup Nick Piggin
2007-01-29 10:32 ` [patch 5/9] mm: debug write deadlocks Nick Piggin
2007-01-29 10:32 ` [patch 6/9] mm: be sure to trim blocks Nick Piggin
2007-01-29 10:32 ` [patch 7/9] mm: cleanup pagecache insertion operations Nick Piggin
2007-01-29 10:32 ` [patch 8/9] mm: generic_file_buffered_write iovec cleanup Nick Piggin
2007-01-29 10:33 ` [patch 9/9] mm: fix pagecache write deadlocks Nick Piggin
2007-01-29 11:11 ` Nick Piggin
2007-02-02 23:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03 1:38 ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-30 20:55 ` [patch 0/9] buffered write deadlock fix Andrew Morton
2007-01-30 23:21 ` Andrew Morton
2007-01-31 1:31 ` Nick Piggin
2007-01-31 0:32 ` Nick Piggin
2007-02-02 23:52 ` Andrew Morton
2007-02-03 1:22 ` Nick Piggin
2007-02-03 6:43 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
[not found] ` <20070203153145.GA3980@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-02-03 15:31 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-02-03 15:31 ` Fengguang Wu
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-02-04 8:49 Nick Piggin
2007-02-04 8:49 ` [patch 1/9] fs: libfs buffered write leak fix Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070202175801.3f97f79b.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=npiggin@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).