From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [take35 0/10] kevent: Generic event handling mechanism. Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 09:13:35 -0800 Message-ID: <20070212091335.9c00d5d9.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <11703247503374@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070205142336.GA24190@2ka.mipt.ru> <20070212103510.GC5703@2ka.mipt.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: davem@davemloft.net, drepper@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, zach.brown@oracle.com, hch@infradead.org, chase.venters@clientec.com, johann.borck@densedata.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jeff@garzik.org, hadi@cyberus.ca, mingo@elte.hu, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Evgeniy Polyakov Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20070212103510.GC5703@2ka.mipt.ru> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org > On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 13:35:10 +0300 Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: > Andrew, do you consider kevent for inclusion or declining? I haven't had time to think about it in the past month or two, sorry. However we might as well get it back in there for review-and-test - please send a new patchset once 2.6.21-rc1 is released and copy me on it?