From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@lazybastard.org>
To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cam.ac.uk>, David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>,
Dave Kleikamp <shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Replace I_LOCK with I_SYNC for fs/fs-writeback.c uses.
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2007 18:54:48 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070221185447.GC3219@lazybastard.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070221130956.GB464@lazybastard.org>
The users of I_LOCK in fs/fs-writeback appear to be independent of
all others. On top, sharing the same bit for __sync_single_inode()
and ifind/ifind_fast caused deadlocks in both LogFS and NTFS.
Introduce a new bit and use that for fs/fs-writeback.c users.
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
include/linux/fs.h | 2 ++
include/linux/writeback.h | 7 +++++++
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index a4b142a..4958fae 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -99,11 +99,11 @@ void __mark_inode_dirty(struct inode *in
inode->i_state |= flags;
/*
- * If the inode is locked, just update its dirty state.
+ * If the inode is being synced, just update its dirty state.
* The unlocker will place the inode on the appropriate
* superblock list, based upon its state.
*/
- if (inode->i_state & I_LOCK)
+ if (inode->i_state & I_SYNC)
goto out;
/*
@@ -139,6 +139,15 @@ static int write_inode(struct inode *ino
return 0;
}
+static void inode_sync_complete(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ /*
+ * Prevent speculative execution through spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
+ */
+ smp_mb();
+ wake_up_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_SYNC);
+}
+
/*
* Write a single inode's dirty pages and inode data out to disk.
* If `wait' is set, wait on the writeout.
@@ -158,11 +167,11 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
int wait = wbc->sync_mode == WB_SYNC_ALL;
int ret;
- BUG_ON(inode->i_state & I_LOCK);
+ BUG_ON(inode->i_state & I_SYNC);
- /* Set I_LOCK, reset I_DIRTY */
+ /* Set I_SYNC, reset I_DIRTY */
dirty = inode->i_state & I_DIRTY;
- inode->i_state |= I_LOCK;
+ inode->i_state |= I_SYNC;
inode->i_state &= ~I_DIRTY;
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
@@ -183,7 +192,7 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
}
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
- inode->i_state &= ~I_LOCK;
+ inode->i_state &= ~I_SYNC;
if (!(inode->i_state & I_FREEING)) {
if (!(inode->i_state & I_DIRTY) &&
mapping_tagged(mapping, PAGECACHE_TAG_DIRTY)) {
@@ -231,7 +240,7 @@ __sync_single_inode(struct inode *inode,
list_move(&inode->i_list, &inode_unused);
}
}
- wake_up_inode(inode);
+ inode_sync_complete(inode);
return ret;
}
@@ -250,7 +259,7 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *i
else
WARN_ON(inode->i_state & I_WILL_FREE);
- if ((wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) && (inode->i_state & I_LOCK)) {
+ if ((wbc->sync_mode != WB_SYNC_ALL) && (inode->i_state & I_SYNC)) {
struct address_space *mapping = inode->i_mapping;
int ret;
@@ -269,16 +278,16 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *i
/*
* It's a data-integrity sync. We must wait.
*/
- if (inode->i_state & I_LOCK) {
- DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wq, &inode->i_state, __I_LOCK);
+ if (inode->i_state & I_SYNC) {
+ DEFINE_WAIT_BIT(wq, &inode->i_state, __I_SYNC);
- wqh = bit_waitqueue(&inode->i_state, __I_LOCK);
+ wqh = bit_waitqueue(&inode->i_state, __I_SYNC);
do {
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
__wait_on_bit(wqh, &wq, inode_wait,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
spin_lock(&inode_lock);
- } while (inode->i_state & I_LOCK);
+ } while (inode->i_state & I_SYNC);
}
return __sync_single_inode(inode, wbc);
}
@@ -311,7 +320,7 @@ __writeback_single_inode(struct inode *i
* The inodes to be written are parked on sb->s_io. They are moved back onto
* sb->s_dirty as they are selected for writing. This way, none can be missed
* on the writer throttling path, and we get decent balancing between many
- * throttled threads: we don't want them all piling up on __wait_on_inode.
+ * throttled threads: we don't want them all piling up on inode_sync_wait.
*/
static void
sync_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb, struct writeback_control *wbc)
@@ -583,7 +592,7 @@ int write_inode_now(struct inode *inode,
ret = __writeback_single_inode(inode, &wbc);
spin_unlock(&inode_lock);
if (sync)
- wait_on_inode(inode);
+ inode_sync_wait(inode);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(write_inode_now);
@@ -658,7 +667,7 @@ int generic_osync_inode(struct inode *in
err = err2;
}
else
- wait_on_inode(inode);
+ inode_sync_wait(inode);
return err;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 86ec3f4..f9eb221 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1184,6 +1184,8 @@ #define I_FREEING 16
#define I_CLEAR 32
#define I_NEW 64
#define I_WILL_FREE 128
+#define __I_SYNC 8
+#define I_SYNC (1 << __I_SYNC) /* Currently being synced */
#define I_DIRTY (I_DIRTY_SYNC | I_DIRTY_DATASYNC | I_DIRTY_PAGES)
diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
index fc35e6b..3abc1d1 100644
--- a/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -77,6 +77,13 @@ static inline void wait_on_inode(struct
wait_on_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_LOCK, inode_wait,
TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
}
+static inline void inode_sync_wait(struct inode *inode)
+{
+ might_sleep();
+ wait_on_bit(&inode->i_state, __I_SYNC, inode_wait,
+ TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE);
+}
+
/*
* mm/page-writeback.c
--
1.4.2.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-02-21 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-02-21 13:09 [RFC] The many faces of the I_LOCK Jörn Engel
2007-02-21 18:29 ` David Chinner
2007-02-21 18:47 ` Jörn Engel
2007-02-21 18:57 ` Jörn Engel
2007-02-21 18:54 ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2007-02-21 18:55 ` [PATCH] [NTFS] Remove ilookup5_nowait and convert users to ilookup5 Jörn Engel
2007-02-21 18:56 ` [PATCH 3/3] Replace I_LOCK with I_SYNC in XFS Jörn Engel
2007-02-22 11:40 ` [RFC] The many faces of the I_LOCK Jörn Engel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070221185447.GC3219@lazybastard.org \
--to=joern@lazybastard.org \
--cc=aia21@cam.ac.uk \
--cc=dgc@sgi.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shaggy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).