From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH] namei.c: remove utterly outdated comment
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2007 16:21:33 +0100
Message-ID: <20070307152133.GB15230@lst.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: akpm@osdl.org
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.210]:47064 "EHLO mail.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751915AbXCGPVi (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 7 Mar 2007 10:21:38 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

We don't have a routine called namei() anymore since at least 2.3.x,
and the comment is just totally out of sync with the current lookup
logic.


Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>

Index: linux-2.6/fs/namei.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/namei.c	2007-02-25 11:54:58.000000000 +0100
+++ linux-2.6/fs/namei.c	2007-02-25 11:55:08.000000000 +0100
@@ -1310,17 +1310,6 @@
 	return ERR_PTR(-EACCES);
 }
 
-/*
- *	namei()
- *
- * is used by most simple commands to get the inode of a specified name.
- * Open, link etc use their own routines, but this is enough for things
- * like 'chmod' etc.
- *
- * namei exists in two versions: namei/lnamei. The only difference is
- * that namei follows links, while lnamei does not.
- * SMP-safe
- */
 int fastcall __user_walk_fd(int dfd, const char __user *name, unsigned flags,
 			    struct nameidata *nd)
 {