From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Filesystems <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] new new aops patchset
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 02:08:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070403000853.GF12295@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1175558450.24533.22.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com>
On Mon, Apr 02, 2007 at 05:00:50PM -0700, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 14:09 +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Updated aops patchset against 2.6.21-rc5.
> >
> > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/npiggin/patches/new-aops/
> >
> > Files/dirs are 2.6.21-rc5-new-aops*
>
> One more cleanup. "index" is unused.
Indeed. I wonder why gcc (at least the 4.0 I'm using) doesn't warn if a
local, non volatile is only ever assigned to?
> BTW, I will take a shot at ext4 tomorrow.
Thanks, so long as you think ext3 is looking OK?
BTW. is it a known issue that ext3 fails fsx-linux? (I tried 2.6.21-rc3
IIRC, and ordered and writeback both eventually failed I think). ext2
does not.
> (If you want me to roll all my fixes and send them to you,u,
>
> 5.)
>
>
> 1\f
c link
>
> 5.orig?
>
> \x11
> h2
> (
^^^ I hope that wasn't due to your running the new aops patches! ;)
>
> and send them to you,
> let me know).
I have merged them all up, so it should be fine. Thanks very much.
Nick
>
> Thanks,
> Badari
>
> ---
> mm/filemap.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> Index: linux-2.6.21-rc5/mm/filemap.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.21-rc5.orig/mm/filemap.c 2007-04-02 16:23:48.000000000 -0700
> +++ linux-2.6.21-rc5/mm/filemap.c 2007-04-02 16:53:13.000000000 -0700
> @@ -2383,14 +2383,12 @@ static ssize_t generic_perform_write(str
>
> do {
> struct page *page;
> - pgoff_t index; /* Pagecache index for current page */
> unsigned long offset; /* Offset into pagecache page */
> unsigned long bytes; /* Bytes to write to page */
> size_t copied; /* Bytes copied from user */
> void *fsdata;
>
> offset = (pos & (PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - 1));
> - index = pos >> PAGE_CACHE_SHIFT;
> bytes = min_t(unsigned long, PAGE_CACHE_SIZE - offset,
> iov_iter_count(i));
>
>
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-03 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-02 12:09 [ANNOUNCE] new new aops patchset Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 20:18 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-03 0:45 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 20:44 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:58 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 15:59 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 2:33 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 21:44 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:08 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:14 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:49 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 15:57 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 2:31 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 23:31 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:35 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 23:56 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-03 0:02 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 0:00 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-03 0:08 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-04-03 9:31 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 16:03 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 2:37 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 17:35 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 3:05 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-04 22:10 ` Mark Fasheh
2007-04-04 22:39 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 22:51 ` Mark Fasheh
2007-04-04 23:02 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 23:05 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 23:17 ` Mark Fasheh
2007-04-04 23:32 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-05 2:08 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 15:21 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-06 1:38 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 2:09 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 0:10 ` David Chinner
2007-04-05 2:13 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-05 7:58 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 2:43 ` David Chinner
2007-04-05 3:00 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 6:18 ` David Chinner
2007-04-05 6:40 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070403000853.GF12295@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.fasheh@oracle.com \
--cc=pbadari@gmail.com \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).