From: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
To: Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@gmail.com>
Cc: Linux Filesystems <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] new new aops patchset
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2007 11:31:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070403093117.GA7747@wotan.suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070403000853.GF12295@wotan.suse.de>
On Tue, Apr 03, 2007 at 02:08:53AM +0200, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > BTW, I will take a shot at ext4 tomorrow.
>
> Thanks, so long as you think ext3 is looking OK?
>
> BTW. is it a known issue that ext3 fails fsx-linux? (I tried 2.6.21-rc3
> IIRC, and ordered and writeback both eventually failed I think). ext2
> does not.
Well I just tested, and it is not fixed by the recent patch to revert
ext3_prepare_failure....
Is this a known issue? Is it an fsx-linux shortcoming? It is fairly
surprising because it basically makes it impossible to test ext3
changes with that nice tool :( I can submit the traces if anyone is
interested, however I can reproduce in UML on an ext3 writeback
filesystem with no arguments (except the filename).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-03 9:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-02 12:09 [ANNOUNCE] new new aops patchset Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 20:18 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-03 0:45 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 20:44 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:58 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 15:59 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 2:33 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 21:44 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:08 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:14 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:49 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 15:57 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 2:31 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 23:31 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-02 23:35 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-02 23:56 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-03 0:02 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 0:00 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-03 0:08 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 9:31 ` Nick Piggin [this message]
2007-04-03 16:03 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 2:37 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-03 17:35 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 3:05 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-04 22:10 ` Mark Fasheh
2007-04-04 22:39 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 22:51 ` Mark Fasheh
2007-04-04 23:02 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 23:05 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-04 23:17 ` Mark Fasheh
2007-04-04 23:32 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-05 2:08 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 15:21 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-04-06 1:38 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 2:09 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 0:10 ` David Chinner
2007-04-05 2:13 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 7:45 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-04-05 7:58 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 2:43 ` David Chinner
2007-04-05 3:00 ` Nick Piggin
2007-04-05 6:18 ` David Chinner
2007-04-05 6:40 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070403093117.GA7747@wotan.suse.de \
--to=npiggin@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.fasheh@oracle.com \
--cc=pbadari@gmail.com \
--cc=swhiteho@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).