From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/17] cramfs: use read_mapping_page Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 10:54:28 +0100 Message-ID: <20070412095428.GA22675@infradead.org> References: <20070412024938.27380.54538.patchbomb.py@localhost> <20070412024938.27380.87060.patchbomb.py@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andrew Morton , Alexander Viro , Christoph Hellwig , Roman Zippel , Mikulas Patocka , David Woodhouse , Dave Kleikamp , Anton Altaparmakov , Evgeniy Dushistov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-dev@namesys.com To: Nate Diller Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:49765 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945974AbXDLJys (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2007 05:54:48 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070412024938.27380.87060.patchbomb.py@localhost> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Apr 11, 2007 at 07:49:38PM -0700, Nate Diller wrote: > read_mapping_page_async() is going away, so convert its only user to > read_mapping_page(). This change has not been benchmarked, however, in > order to get real parallelism this wants something completely different, > like __do_page_cache_readahead(), which is not currently exported. Why is read_mapping_page_async going away? This probably needs a lot more testing, and I'd be much happier if you split it out of the series and sent it separately at the end.