From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH 02/16] cancel_delayed_work: use del_timer() instead of del_timer_sync() [try #4]
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 16:49:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070425154907.26581.85907.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070425154854.26581.97692.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com>
del_timer_sync() buys nothing for cancel_delayed_work(), but it is less
efficient since it locks the timer unconditionally, and may wait for the
completion of the delayed_work_timer_fn().
cancel_delayed_work() == 0 means:
before this patch:
work->func may still be running or queued
after this patch:
work->func may still be running or queued, or
delayed_work_timer_fn->__queue_work() in progress.
The latter doesn't differ from the caller's POV,
delayed_work_timer_fn() is called with _PENDING
bit set.
cancel_delayed_work() == 1 with this patch adds a new possibility:
delayed_work->work was cancelled, but delayed_work_timer_fn
is still running (this is only possible for the re-arming
works on single-threaded workqueue).
In this case the timer was re-started by work->func(), nobody
else can do this. This in turn means that delayed_work_timer_fn
has already passed __queue_work() (and wont't touch delayed_work)
because nobody else can queue delayed_work->work.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>
Signed-Off-By: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/workqueue.h | 7 ++++---
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/workqueue.h b/include/linux/workqueue.h
index 2a7b38d..b8abfc7 100644
--- a/include/linux/workqueue.h
+++ b/include/linux/workqueue.h
@@ -191,14 +191,15 @@ int execute_in_process_context(work_func_t fn, struct execute_work *);
/*
* Kill off a pending schedule_delayed_work(). Note that the work callback
- * function may still be running on return from cancel_delayed_work(). Run
- * flush_scheduled_work() to wait on it.
+ * function may still be running on return from cancel_delayed_work(), unless
+ * it returns 1 and the work doesn't re-arm itself. Run flush_workqueue() or
+ * cancel_work_sync() to wait on it.
*/
static inline int cancel_delayed_work(struct delayed_work *work)
{
int ret;
- ret = del_timer_sync(&work->timer);
+ ret = del_timer(&work->timer);
if (ret)
work_release(&work->work);
return ret;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-25 15:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-25 15:48 [PATCH 00/16] AF_RXRPC socket family and AFS rewrite [try #4] David Howells
2007-04-25 15:49 ` [PATCH 01/16] AF_RXRPC: Move generic skbuff stuff from XFRM code to generic code " David Howells
2007-04-25 15:49 ` David Howells [this message]
2007-04-25 15:49 ` [PATCH 03/16] AF_RXRPC: Key facility changes for AF_RXRPC " David Howells
2007-04-25 15:49 ` [PATCH 04/16] AF_RXRPC: Make it possible to merely try to cancel timers from a module " David Howells
2007-04-25 15:49 ` [PATCH 07/16] AF_RXRPC: Add an interface to the AF_RXRPC module for the AFS filesystem to use " David Howells
2007-04-25 15:49 ` [PATCH 10/16] AFS: Handle multiple mounts of an AFS superblock correctly " David Howells
2007-04-25 15:49 ` [PATCH 11/16] AFS: Add security support " David Howells
2007-04-25 15:49 ` [PATCH 12/16] AFS: Update the AFS fs documentation " David Howells
2007-04-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 13/16] commit ad495d7b6cfcd1bc2eaf06c42699be0bb5d84234 " David Howells
2007-04-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 14/16] AFS: Add support for the CB.GetCapabilities operation " David Howells
2007-04-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 15/16] AFS: Implement the CB.InitCallBackState3 " David Howells
2007-04-25 15:50 ` [PATCH 16/16] AFS: Add "directory write" support " David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070425154907.26581.85907.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).