From: Valerie Henson <val_henson@linux.intel.com>
To: Nikita Danilov <nikita@clusterfs.com>
Cc: David Lang <david.lang@digitalinsight.com>,
Amit Gud <gud@cis.ksu.edu>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
riel@surriel.com, zab@zabbo.net, arjan@infradead.org,
suparna@in.ibm.com, brandon@ifup.org, karunasagark@gmail.com,
gud@ksu.edu
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck
Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:47:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070425224710.GB16129@nifty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <17967.15531.450627.972572@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
On Wed, Apr 25, 2007 at 03:34:03PM +0400, Nikita Danilov wrote:
>
> What is more important, design puts (as far as I can see) no upper limit
> on the number of continuation inodes, and hence, even if _average_ fsck
> time is greatly reduced, occasionally it can take more time than ext2 of
> the same size. This is clearly unacceptable in many situations (HA,
> etc.).
Actually, there is an upper limit on the number of continuation
inodes. Each file can have a maximum of one continuation inode per
chunk. (This is why we need to support sparse files.)
-VAL
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-04-25 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-04-23 11:21 [RFC][PATCH] ChunkFS: fs fission for faster fsck Amit Gud
[not found] ` <17965.6084 1.900376.524639@gargle.gargle.HOWL>
2007-04-23 16:28 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2007-04-23 15:25 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-23 16:32 ` Suparna Bhattacharya
2007-04-24 11:44 ` Nikita Danilov
2007-04-24 18:27 ` David Lang
2007-04-24 19:34 ` Nikita Danilov
2007-04-24 19:26 ` David Lang
2007-04-25 11:34 ` Nikita Danilov
2007-04-25 16:39 ` David Lang
2007-04-25 22:47 ` Valerie Henson [this message]
2007-04-26 14:14 ` Jeff Dike
2007-04-26 15:53 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-26 16:05 ` Jeff Dike
2007-04-26 16:56 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-27 4:58 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-27 15:06 ` Jeff Dike
2007-05-01 17:26 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-26 16:11 ` Alan Cox
2007-04-26 16:44 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-24 21:53 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-25 10:54 ` David Chinner
2007-04-25 11:38 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-04-25 17:52 ` Amit Gud
2007-04-25 23:06 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-25 23:03 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-26 0:47 ` David Chinner
2007-04-26 22:21 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-26 8:47 ` Jan Kara
2007-04-27 5:07 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-27 10:53 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-28 6:50 ` Valerie Henson
2007-04-28 10:03 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-25 22:43 ` Valerie Henson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070425224710.GB16129@nifty \
--to=val_henson@linux.intel.com \
--cc=arjan@infradead.org \
--cc=brandon@ifup.org \
--cc=david.lang@digitalinsight.com \
--cc=gud@cis.ksu.edu \
--cc=gud@ksu.edu \
--cc=karunasagark@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nikita@clusterfs.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=suparna@in.ibm.com \
--cc=zab@zabbo.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).