linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com>
To: "Jörn Engel" <joern@lazybastard.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] TileFS - a proposal for scalable integrity checking
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:24:30 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070429162430.GI11115@waste.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070429155847.GC30608@lazybastard.org>

On Sun, Apr 29, 2007 at 05:58:48PM +0200, Jörn Engel wrote:
> On Sat, 28 April 2007 17:05:22 -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > 
> > Some things we need to check during fsck:
> > 
> >  all directories point to in-use inodes
> >  all in-use inodes are referred to by directories
> >  all inodes in use are marked in use
> >  all free inodes are marked free
> >  all inodes point to in-use blocks
> >  all inode refcounts are correct
> >  all inode block counts are correct
> >  free inode count is correct
> > 
> >  no blocks are used twice
> >  all used blocks are marked as used
> >  all free blocks are marked as free
> >  optional: all block contents are correct
> 
>    statfs information matches filesystem content
> 
> This one may still require a full fsck in your current approach.  One if
> the good aspects of ChunkFS (assuming my understanding matches reality)
> is to have per-chunk counters for free blocks, free inodes, etc.  For a
> fast fsck you would need to have these counters per-unit as well.  It
> doesn't matter whether your unit is a tile, chunk, blockgroup or
> karboozel.

Yes. This is probably not a very big problem. Once we've checked all
the tiles in a block group and they're clean, we know that block and
inode bitmaps are correct, so we can doublecheck the per-blockgroup
counters.

One obvious approach is simply batching a blockgroup's worth of tiles
at a time (if tile header entries are 64 bits, then there are 64 tiles
in a block group). Then you keep running totals and check at the end.
Memory usage is still O(single tile).

Summing blockgroup totals across a million block groups.. we'll
probably want something like:

> Having some tree structure for these counters would also help.  Statfs
> requires to add all counters for all units.  Smaller units speed up fsck
> but slow down statfs.  With a tree statfs can be O(log(n)).

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2007-04-29 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-04-28 22:05 [RFC] TileFS - a proposal for scalable integrity checking Matt Mackall
2007-04-29 12:21 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-29 12:57   ` Matt Mackall
2007-04-29 15:47     ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-09  5:56   ` Valerie Henson
2007-05-09 10:12     ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-29 15:58 ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-29 16:24   ` Matt Mackall [this message]
2007-04-29 16:34 ` Andi Kleen
2007-04-29 16:05   ` Jörn Engel
2007-04-29 16:09   ` Matt Mackall
2007-04-29 23:23 ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-30  1:40   ` Matt Mackall
2007-04-30 17:26     ` Theodore Tso
2007-04-30 17:59       ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-02 13:18         ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-02 13:32     ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-02 15:37       ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-02 16:35         ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-09  7:56     ` Valerie Henson
2007-05-09 11:16       ` Nikita Danilov
2007-05-09 18:56         ` Valerie Henson
2007-05-09 19:19           ` Nikita Danilov
2007-05-09 17:06       ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-09 18:59         ` Valerie Henson
2007-05-09 19:51           ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-10  0:03             ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-11  9:46             ` Valerie Henson
2007-05-11 15:55               ` Matt Mackall
2007-05-09 19:01     ` Valerie Henson
2007-05-09 20:05       ` Matt Mackall

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070429162430.GI11115@waste.org \
    --to=mpm@selenic.com \
    --cc=joern@lazybastard.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).