linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	dhowells@redhat.com
Subject: [PATCH] AF_RXRPC: Sort out MTU handling
Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 15:56:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070504145647.19125.99441.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com> (raw)

Sort out the MTU determination and handling in AF_RXRPC:

 (1) If it's present, parse the additional information supplied by the peer at
     the end of the ACK packet (struct ackinfo) to determine the MTU sizes
     that peer is willing to support.

 (2) Initialise the MTU size to that peer from the kernel's routing records.

 (3) Send ACKs rather than ACKALLs as the former carry the additional info,
     and the latter do not.

 (4) Declare the interface MTU size in outgoing ACKs as a maximum amount of
     data that can be stuffed into an RxRPC packet without it having to be
     fragmented to come in this computer's NIC.

 (5) If sendmsg() is given MSG_MORE then it should allocate an skb of the
     maximum size rather than one just big enough for the data it's got left
     to process on the theory that there is more data to come that it can
     append to that packet.

     This means, for example, that if AFS does a large StoreData op, all the
     packets barring the last will be filled to the maximum unfragmented size.

Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
---

 net/rxrpc/ar-ack.c    |   80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 net/rxrpc/ar-error.c  |    2 +
 net/rxrpc/ar-output.c |    2 +
 net/rxrpc/ar-peer.c   |   45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
 4 files changed, 115 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-ack.c b/net/rxrpc/ar-ack.c
index fc07a92..657ee69 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-ack.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-ack.c
@@ -543,6 +543,38 @@ static void rxrpc_zap_tx_window(struct rxrpc_call *call)
 }
 
 /*
+ * process the extra information that may be appended to an ACK packet
+ */
+static void rxrpc_extract_ackinfo(struct rxrpc_call *call, struct sk_buff *skb,
+				  unsigned latest, int nAcks)
+{
+	struct rxrpc_ackinfo ackinfo;
+	struct rxrpc_peer *peer;
+	unsigned mtu;
+
+	if (skb_copy_bits(skb, nAcks + 3, &ackinfo, sizeof(ackinfo)) < 0) {
+		_leave(" [no ackinfo]");
+		return;
+	}
+
+	_proto("Rx ACK %%%u Info { rx=%u max=%u rwin=%u jm=%u }",
+	       latest,
+	       ntohl(ackinfo.rxMTU), ntohl(ackinfo.maxMTU),
+	       ntohl(ackinfo.rwind), ntohl(ackinfo.jumbo_max));
+
+	mtu = min(ntohl(ackinfo.rxMTU), ntohl(ackinfo.maxMTU));
+
+	peer = call->conn->trans->peer;
+	if (mtu < peer->maxdata) {
+		spin_lock_bh(&peer->lock);
+		peer->maxdata = mtu;
+		peer->mtu = mtu + peer->hdrsize;
+		spin_unlock_bh(&peer->lock);
+		_net("Net MTU %u (maxdata %u)", peer->mtu, peer->maxdata);
+	}
+}
+
+/*
  * process packets in the reception queue
  */
 static int rxrpc_process_rx_queue(struct rxrpc_call *call,
@@ -606,6 +638,8 @@ process_further:
 		       rxrpc_acks[ack.reason],
 		       ack.nAcks);
 
+		rxrpc_extract_ackinfo(call, skb, latest, ack.nAcks);
+
 		if (ack.reason == RXRPC_ACK_PING) {
 			_proto("Rx ACK %%%u PING Request", latest);
 			rxrpc_propose_ACK(call, RXRPC_ACK_PING_RESPONSE,
@@ -801,9 +835,9 @@ void rxrpc_process_call(struct work_struct *work)
 	struct msghdr msg;
 	struct kvec iov[5];
 	unsigned long bits;
-	__be32 data;
+	__be32 data, pad;
 	size_t len;
-	int genbit, loop, nbit, ioc, ret;
+	int genbit, loop, nbit, ioc, ret, mtu;
 	u32 abort_code = RX_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
 	u8 *acks = NULL;
 
@@ -899,9 +933,30 @@ void rxrpc_process_call(struct work_struct *work)
 	}
 
 	if (test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_ACK_FINAL, &call->events)) {
-		hdr.type = RXRPC_PACKET_TYPE_ACKALL;
 		genbit = RXRPC_CALL_ACK_FINAL;
-		goto send_message;
+
+		ack.bufferSpace	= htons(8);
+		ack.maxSkew	= 0;
+		ack.serial	= 0;
+		ack.reason	= RXRPC_ACK_IDLE;
+		ack.nAcks	= 0;
+		call->ackr_reason = 0;
+
+		spin_lock_bh(&call->lock);
+		ack.serial = call->ackr_serial;
+		ack.previousPacket = call->ackr_prev_seq;
+		ack.firstPacket = htonl(call->rx_data_eaten + 1);
+		spin_unlock_bh(&call->lock);
+
+		pad = 0;
+
+		iov[1].iov_base = &ack;
+		iov[1].iov_len	= sizeof(ack);
+		iov[2].iov_base = &pad;
+		iov[2].iov_len	= 3;
+		iov[3].iov_base = &ackinfo;
+		iov[3].iov_len	= sizeof(ackinfo);
+		goto send_ACK;
 	}
 
 	if (call->events & ((1 << RXRPC_CALL_RCVD_BUSY) |
@@ -971,8 +1026,6 @@ void rxrpc_process_call(struct work_struct *work)
 
 	/* consider sending an ordinary ACK */
 	if (test_bit(RXRPC_CALL_ACK, &call->events)) {
-		__be32 pad;
-
 		_debug("send ACK: window: %d - %d { %lx }",
 		       call->rx_data_eaten, call->ackr_win_top,
 		       call->ackr_window[0]);
@@ -997,12 +1050,6 @@ void rxrpc_process_call(struct work_struct *work)
 		ack.serial	= 0;
 		ack.reason	= 0;
 
-		ackinfo.rxMTU	= htonl(5692);
-//		ackinfo.rxMTU	= htonl(call->conn->trans->peer->maxdata);
-		ackinfo.maxMTU	= htonl(call->conn->trans->peer->maxdata);
-		ackinfo.rwind	= htonl(32);
-		ackinfo.jumbo_max = htonl(4);
-
 		spin_lock_bh(&call->lock);
 		ack.reason = call->ackr_reason;
 		ack.serial = call->ackr_serial;
@@ -1116,6 +1163,15 @@ send_ACK_with_skew:
 	ack.maxSkew = htons(atomic_read(&call->conn->hi_serial) -
 			    ntohl(ack.serial));
 send_ACK:
+	mtu = call->conn->trans->peer->if_mtu;
+	mtu -= call->conn->trans->peer->hdrsize;
+	ackinfo.maxMTU	= htonl(mtu);
+	ackinfo.rwind	= htonl(32);
+
+	/* permit the peer to send us jumbo packets if it wants to */
+	ackinfo.rxMTU	= htonl(5692);
+	ackinfo.jumbo_max = htonl(4);
+
 	hdr.serial = htonl(atomic_inc_return(&call->conn->serial));
 	_proto("Tx ACK %%%u { m=%hu f=#%u p=#%u s=%%%u r=%s n=%u }",
 	       ntohl(hdr.serial),
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-error.c b/net/rxrpc/ar-error.c
index 2c27df1..6cb3e88 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-error.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-error.c
@@ -100,8 +100,10 @@ void rxrpc_UDP_error_report(struct sock *sk)
 		}
 
 		if (mtu < peer->mtu) {
+			spin_lock_bh(&peer->lock);
 			peer->mtu = mtu;
 			peer->maxdata = peer->mtu - peer->hdrsize;
+			spin_unlock_bh(&peer->lock);
 			_net("Net MTU %u (maxdata %u)",
 			     peer->mtu, peer->maxdata);
 		}
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-output.c b/net/rxrpc/ar-output.c
index 5cdde4a..591c442 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-output.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-output.c
@@ -582,7 +582,7 @@ static int rxrpc_send_data(struct kiocb *iocb,
 			max &= ~(call->conn->size_align - 1UL);
 
 			chunk = max;
-			if (chunk > len)
+			if (chunk > len && !more)
 				chunk = len;
 
 			space = chunk + call->conn->size_align;
diff --git a/net/rxrpc/ar-peer.c b/net/rxrpc/ar-peer.c
index d399de4..ce08b78 100644
--- a/net/rxrpc/ar-peer.c
+++ b/net/rxrpc/ar-peer.c
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 #include <net/sock.h>
 #include <net/af_rxrpc.h>
 #include <net/ip.h>
+#include <net/route.h>
 #include "ar-internal.h"
 
 static LIST_HEAD(rxrpc_peers);
@@ -28,6 +29,47 @@ static DECLARE_WAIT_QUEUE_HEAD(rxrpc_peer_wq);
 static void rxrpc_destroy_peer(struct work_struct *work);
 
 /*
+ * assess the MTU size for the network interface through which this peer is
+ * reached
+ */
+static void rxrpc_assess_MTU_size(struct rxrpc_peer *peer)
+{
+	struct rtable *rt;
+	struct flowi fl;
+	int ret;
+
+	peer->if_mtu = 1500;
+
+	memset(&fl, 0, sizeof(fl));
+
+	switch (peer->srx.transport.family) {
+	case AF_INET:
+		fl.oif = 0;
+		fl.proto = IPPROTO_UDP,
+		fl.nl_u.ip4_u.saddr = 0;
+		fl.nl_u.ip4_u.daddr = peer->srx.transport.sin.sin_addr.s_addr;
+		fl.nl_u.ip4_u.tos = 0;
+		/* assume AFS.CM talking to AFS.FS */
+		fl.uli_u.ports.sport = htons(7001);
+		fl.uli_u.ports.dport = htons(7000);
+		break;
+	default:
+		BUG();
+	}
+
+	ret = ip_route_output_key(&rt, &fl);
+	if (ret < 0) {
+		kleave(" [route err %d]", ret);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	peer->if_mtu = dst_mtu(&rt->u.dst);
+	dst_release(&rt->u.dst);
+
+	kleave(" [if_mtu %u]", peer->if_mtu);
+}
+
+/*
  * allocate a new peer
  */
 static struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_alloc_peer(struct sockaddr_rxrpc *srx,
@@ -47,7 +89,8 @@ static struct rxrpc_peer *rxrpc_alloc_peer(struct sockaddr_rxrpc *srx,
 		peer->debug_id = atomic_inc_return(&rxrpc_debug_id);
 		memcpy(&peer->srx, srx, sizeof(*srx));
 
-		peer->mtu = peer->if_mtu = 65535;
+		rxrpc_assess_MTU_size(peer);
+		peer->mtu = peer->if_mtu;
 
 		if (srx->transport.family == AF_INET) {
 			peer->hdrsize = sizeof(struct iphdr);


             reply	other threads:[~2007-05-04 14:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-04 14:56 David Howells [this message]
2007-05-04 19:42 ` [PATCH] AF_RXRPC: Sort out MTU handling David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070504145647.19125.99441.stgit@warthog.cambridge.redhat.com \
    --to=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).