From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 18:41:59 +0200 Message-ID: <20070516164158.GB8113@lazybastard.org> References: <20070515151919.GA32510@lazybastard.org> <20070515133759.9ee434a2.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1179317240.2859.222.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> <20070516083408.dcd9dd78.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <1179330596.2859.248.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: Andrew Morton , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, Albert Cahalan , Thomas Gleixner , Jan Engelhardt , Evgeniy Polyakov , Pekka Enberg , Greg KH , Ingo Oeser To: David Woodhouse Return-path: Received: from lazybastard.de ([212.112.238.170]:50480 "EHLO longford.lazybastard.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1762790AbXEPQq0 (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 May 2007 12:46:26 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1179330596.2859.248.camel@shinybook.infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, 16 May 2007 23:49:55 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote: >=20 > Utility is a factor of the underlying design -- a filesystem designed > for flash really isn't suited to block devices. I can think of at least three examples where LogFS would indeed make sense on block devices. J=C3=B6rn --=20 Happiness isn't having what you want, it's wanting what you have. -- unknown - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html