linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jörn Engel" <joern@lazybastard.org>
To: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
Cc: Dongjun Shin <djshin90@gmail.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org,
	Albert Cahalan <acahalan@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>, Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>,
	Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 14:05:21 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070517120520.GA15676@lazybastard.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1179391440.2859.447.camel@shinybook.infradead.org>

On Thu, 17 May 2007 16:43:59 +0800, David Woodhouse wrote:
> 
> > As I mentioned, some techniques like log-structured filesystem could
> > perform generally better on any kind of flash-based storage with FTL.
> > Although there are many kinds of FTL, it is commonly true that
> > it performs well under workload where sequential write is dominant.
> 
> Yes, it's certainly possible that we _could_ write a file system which
> is specifically targeted at FTL -- I was just wondering why anyone would
> _bother_ :)

Haven't you done that already?  JFFS2 write behaviour is the best-case
scenario for any FTL.  When the delta cache is finished, LogFS will be
pretty close to that as well.

Not sure if anyone would specifically target FTL.  Being well-suited for
those beasts is just a side-effect.

The FTL is still a net loss.  Without that FAT enabling layer a real
flash filesystem would be more efficient.

Jörn

-- 
Prosperity makes friends, adversity tries them.
-- Publilius Syrus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

  reply	other threads:[~2007-05-17 12:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 87+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-05-15 15:19 [PATCH] LogFS take three Jörn Engel
2007-05-15 15:21 ` Review status (Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three) Jörn Engel
2007-05-17 16:03   ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-05-17 17:10     ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-20 17:30       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-05-23 12:58         ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-23 15:07           ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-05-23 15:14             ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-23 15:53               ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-05-15 18:37 ` [PATCH] LogFS take three Sam Ravnborg
2007-05-15 19:10   ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-15 19:07 ` John Stoffel
2007-05-15 19:19   ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-16  4:54     ` David Woodhouse
2007-05-16 11:09       ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-16 11:34         ` Jamie Lokier
2007-05-16 11:38           ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-16 12:25             ` Jamie Lokier
2007-05-16 12:49               ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-16 11:50           ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-16 12:06             ` CaT
2007-05-17 17:07               ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-16 12:29             ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-05-16 12:55               ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-17 17:08                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-16 13:41             ` John Stoffel
2007-05-16 13:53               ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-16 14:04                 ` David Woodhouse
2007-05-16 14:13                   ` Artem Bityutskiy
2007-05-16 14:17                   ` Kevin Bowling
2007-05-17  9:12                     ` Pavel Machek
2007-05-17  9:52                       ` David Woodhouse
2007-05-19 15:00                     ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-16 14:29                 ` CaT
2007-05-17 17:14                 ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-19 14:45                 ` David Weinehall
2007-05-19 16:17                   ` Jamie Lokier
2007-05-19 16:27                     ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-05-17 16:59         ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-17 11:39     ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-05-15 20:37 ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16  0:06   ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-16  2:11     ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-16  5:22     ` Willy Tarreau
2007-05-16 11:23       ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-17 17:26     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-17 17:45       ` Evgeniy Polyakov
2007-05-18  1:00         ` Kyle Moffett
2007-05-18  6:16           ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-16 12:07   ` David Woodhouse
2007-05-16 15:34     ` Andrew Morton
2007-05-16 15:49       ` David Woodhouse
2007-05-16 16:41         ` Jörn Engel
     [not found]           ` <7fe698080705162312t4e7ed90byd10ef8e664027b17@mail.gmail.com>
2007-05-17  6:25             ` David Woodhouse
2007-05-17  8:20               ` Dongjun Shin
2007-05-17  8:43                 ` David Woodhouse
2007-05-17 12:05                   ` Jörn Engel [this message]
2007-05-17 20:18                 ` Pavel Machek
2007-05-18  0:01                   ` Dongjun Shin
2007-05-18  6:17                     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-18  6:47                       ` David Woodhouse
2007-05-19 15:18                 ` Bill Davidsen
2007-05-19  6:15   ` Rob Landley
2007-05-19  9:24     ` Jan Engelhardt
2007-05-19 17:26       ` Rob Landley
2007-05-15 23:26 ` Albert Cahalan
2007-05-16  0:09   ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-16 11:18   ` Jamie Lokier
2007-05-16 12:08     ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-16 12:58       ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-16  2:37 ` Roland Dreier
2007-05-16 11:35   ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-16 10:21 ` Pekka J Enberg
2007-05-16 12:26   ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-16 12:36     ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-16 12:38       ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-16 13:20       ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-17 20:58         ` Pekka Enberg
2007-05-17 21:36           ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-05-17 21:50             ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-16 19:17 ` Pavel Machek
2007-05-16 19:23   ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-17 15:08 ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-05-17 20:21   ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-17 21:00     ` Arnd Bergmann
2007-05-17 21:30       ` Jörn Engel
2007-05-17 22:01     ` Jamie Lokier

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070517120520.GA15676@lazybastard.org \
    --to=joern@lazybastard.org \
    --cc=acahalan@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=djshin90@gmail.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=ioe-lkml@rameria.de \
    --cc=jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de \
    --cc=johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=penberg@cs.helsinki.fi \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).