From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: =?utf-8?B?SsO2cm4=?= Engel <joern@lazybastard.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] LogFS take three
Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 23:30:39 +0200
Message-ID: <20070517213038.GF15676@lazybastard.org>
References: <20070515151919.GA32510@lazybastard.org> <200705171708.53038.arnd@arndb.de> <20070517202139.GD15676@lazybastard.org> <200705172300.21694.arnd@arndb.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, akpm@osdl.org,
	Albert Cahalan <acahalan@gmail.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@linux01.gwdg.de>,
	Evgeniy Polyakov <johnpol@2ka.mipt.ru>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@cs.helsinki.fi>,
	Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Ingo Oeser <ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1761706AbXEQVfZ@vger.kernel.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <200705172300.21694.arnd@arndb.de>
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 17 May 2007 23:00:20 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>=20
> Just using nanoseconds probably doesn't gain you much after all
> then. You could however just have separate 32 bit fields in the
> inode for seconds and nanoseconds, that will result in the exact
> same layout that you have right now, but won't require a conversion
> function.

I could also have a 30bit and a 34bit field.  30bit is enough for
nanoseconds.  So many options.

J=C3=B6rn

--=20
Time? What's that? Time is only worth what you do with it.
-- Theo de Raadt