From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [patch 12/41] fs: introduce write_begin, write_end, and perform_write aops Date: Wed, 30 May 2007 22:11:21 -0700 Message-ID: <20070530221121.7eadc807.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20070524052844.860329000@suse.de> <20070524053155.065366000@linux.local0.net> <20070530213035.d7b6e3e0.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070531044327.GD20107@wotan.suse.de> <20070530215231.468e7f26.akpm@linux-foundation.org> <20070531045754.GE20107@wotan.suse.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Mark Fasheh , Linux Memory Management To: Nick Piggin Return-path: Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.13]:37066 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754184AbXEaFMB (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2007 01:12:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070531045754.GE20107@wotan.suse.de> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, 31 May 2007 06:57:54 +0200 Nick Piggin wrote: > > Don't know - I shelved the patches. > > Oh, that didn't last long :P I have a heap of other stuff to get out the door. If I have to do just two bisects then it's 4AM and I give up then I have to repull everything and we're back to square one. Fortunately, I didn't need to do a bisect this time. That's unusual. > > > Given the great pile of build errors, I think we need the next rev. > > I was working on bringing some of the others uptodate (hopefully > before you did another release). There is not much point in doing > that if they don't get merged because the patches just break again. There's not much point in sending build-busting patches either. Lots of people run allmodconfig. My sympathy for broken patches is limited - you should see what happens over here ;) I can do you a rollup with those patches reinstated after I've done rc3-mm1 if you like. > Were there build errors in any core code or converted filesystems? > AFAIKS it was just in reiser4 and a couple of the "cont" filesystems > that didn't get converted yet. The _cont filesystems, reiser4 and that revoke warning.