From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
To: nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] nfsd: set the response bitmask for an EXCLUSIVE CREATE
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 13:56:55 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070605135655.a58f0b41.jlayton@redhat.com> (raw)
RFC 3530 says:
If the server uses an attribute to store the exclusive
create verifier, it will signify which attribute by setting the
appropriate bit in the attribute mask that is returned in the
results.
Linux uses the atime and mtime to store the verifier, but sends a zeroed out
bitmask back to the client. This patch makes sure that we set the correct
bits in the bitmask in this situation.
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
diff --git a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
index 8522729..da20674 100644
--- a/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfsd/nfs4proc.c
@@ -99,7 +99,15 @@ do_open_lookup(struct svc_rqst *rqstp, struct svc_fh *current_fh, struct nfsd4_o
status = nfsd_create_v3(rqstp, current_fh, open->op_fname.data,
open->op_fname.len, &open->op_iattr,
&resfh, open->op_createmode,
- (u32 *)open->op_verf.data, &open->op_truncate, &created);
+ (u32 *)open->op_verf.data,
+ &open->op_truncate, &created);
+
+ /* If we ever decide to use different attrs to store the
+ * verifier in nfsd_create_v3, then we'll need to change this
+ */
+ if (open->op_createmode == NFS4_CREATE_EXCLUSIVE && status == 0)
+ open->op_bmval[1] |= (FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_ACCESS |
+ FATTR4_WORD1_TIME_MODIFY);
} else {
status = nfsd_lookup(rqstp, current_fh,
open->op_fname.data, open->op_fname.len, &resfh);
reply other threads:[~2007-06-05 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070605135655.a58f0b41.jlayton@redhat.com \
--to=jlayton@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).