From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/26] mount_is_safe(): add comment
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 08:47:18 +0100
Message-ID: <20070623074718.GL27954@infradead.org>
References: <20070622200303.82D9CC3A@kernel> <20070622200322.F1AC0AC0@kernel>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, hch@infradead.org,
	viro@ftp.linux.org.uk
To: Dave Hansen <haveblue@us.ibm.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:50314 "EHLO
	pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1754260AbXFWHrU (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 23 Jun 2007 03:47:20 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070622200322.F1AC0AC0@kernel>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Fri, Jun 22, 2007 at 01:03:22PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> 
> 
> This area of code is currently #ifdef'd out, so add a comment
> for the time when it is actually used.

Ok.  Does this clash with the user mount patches?  Even if it does
I think we want this patch first in the series and fix the user mounts
up ontop of it.