From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [-mm PATCH] ocfs2: ->fallocate() support
Date: Sat, 23 Jun 2007 09:54:15 -0700
Message-ID: <20070623095415.6fba0f73.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20070621190143.GC17713@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: aarora@in.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com
To: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:57316 "EHLO
	smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1759769AbXFWQ5d (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Sat, 23 Jun 2007 12:57:33 -0400
In-Reply-To: <20070621190143.GC17713@ca-server1.us.oracle.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

> On Thu, 21 Jun 2007 12:01:43 -0700 Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com> wrote:
> Plug ocfs2 into the ->fallocate() callback. We only support FA_ALLOCATE for
> now - FA_DEALLOCATE will come later.

I get a healthy reject when applying this against your own tree.  Perhaps
because my copy of it is a few days old, dunno.

I think I'll duck it, allow you to merge this in the normal fashion once
fallocate hits mainline, OK?