From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
Cc: jjohansen@suse.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFD 0/4] AppArmor - Don't pass NULL nameidata to vfs_create/lookup/permission IOPs
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:15:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070630091530.GC21784@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1182901575.12836.54.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org>
On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 07:46:15PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> I don't object to the concept per se, but could you please give it a
> more descriptive name please? "struct vfs_intent" would be a lot more
> accurate than "nameidata2".
Agreed, but I prefer lookup_intent - intent by itself is a word with
just to wide useage and vfs doesn't make it much clearer..
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-30 9:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-26 23:15 [RFD 0/4] AppArmor - Don't pass NULL nameidata to vfs_create/lookup/permission IOPs jjohansen
2007-06-26 23:15 ` [RFD 1/4] Pass no useless nameidata to the create, lookup, and permission IOPs jjohansen
2007-06-27 0:11 ` Erez Zadok
2007-06-30 9:14 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-30 9:13 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-06-30 16:13 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-06-26 23:15 ` [RFD 2/4] Never pass a NULL nameidata to vfs_create() jjohansen
2007-06-26 23:15 ` [RFD 3/4] Dont use a NULL nameidata in xattr_permission() jjohansen
2007-06-26 23:15 ` [RFD 4/4] Pass nameidata2 to permission() from nfsd_permission() jjohansen
2007-06-26 23:46 ` [RFD 0/4] AppArmor - Don't pass NULL nameidata to vfs_create/lookup/permission IOPs Trond Myklebust
2007-06-27 20:42 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-06-30 9:15 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070630091530.GC21784@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jjohansen@suse.de \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).