From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [patch 1/3] add the fsblock layer Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 11:40:02 +0100 Message-ID: <20070630104002.GA24123@infradead.org> References: <20070624014528.GA17609@wotan.suse.de> <20070624014613.GB17609@wotan.suse.de> <18046.63436.472085.535177@notabene.brown> <467F71C6.6040204@yahoo.com.au> <20070625122906.GB12446@think.oraclecorp.com> <46807B32.6050302@yahoo.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Chris Mason , Neil Brown , Nick Piggin , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Memory Management List , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Nick Piggin Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:56948 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754790AbXF3KkG (ORCPT ); Sat, 30 Jun 2007 06:40:06 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <46807B32.6050302@yahoo.com.au> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 26, 2007 at 12:34:26PM +1000, Nick Piggin wrote: > That would require a new inode and address_space for the fsblock > type blockdev pagecache, wouldn't it? Yes. That's easily possible, XFS already does it for it's own buffer cache.