From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/26] sys_mknodat(): elevate write count for vfs_mknod/create() Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:22:48 +0100 Message-ID: <20070711102248.GC21947@infradead.org> References: <20070622200303.82D9CC3A@kernel> <20070622200332.DCCD1884@kernel> <20070623075103.GS27954@infradead.org> <1182784792.26162.86.camel@localhost> <20070630093901.GI22354@infradead.org> <1183675412.10287.91.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Dave Hansen , Christoph Hellwig , haveblue@linux.vnet.ibm.com, akpm@osdl.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk To: Jan Engelhardt Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:41925 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756873AbXGKKWv (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Jul 2007 06:22:51 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 08:25:31PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote: > Hm, I wonder why mknod(,S_IFDIR,) returns -EPERM rather than -EINVAL like the > others? Posix.