From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: cmm@us.ibm.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 5/5] i_version: noversion mount option to disable inode version updates
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2007 05:57:17 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070711115716.GU6417@schatzie.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070710163144.21b739f9.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
On Jul 10, 2007 16:31 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Sun, 01 Jul 2007 03:37:53 -0400
> Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> > Add a "noversion" mount option to disable inode version updates.
>
> Why is this option being offered to our users? To reduce disk traffic,
> like noatime?
>
> If so, what are the implications of this? What would the user lose?
Ah, this is the patch to disable i_version updates for Lustre. I don't
think any normal user would use this mount option, so I don't know if
there is a need to document it. There are no performance implications,
unless we end up changing the mtime granularity JUST to update i_version,
in which case we can avoid some overhead if not exporting with NFSv4.
If we want to go in the direction of forcing extra inode updates just
for this, then we might even consider making i_version updates on disk
default to OFF unless NFSv4 has exported the filesystem at least once,
and then it should set a persistent flag in the superblock indicating
that i_version updates are needed.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-11 11:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-01 7:37 [EXT4 set 4][PATCH 5/5] i_version: noversion mount option to disable inode version updates Mingming Cao
2007-07-10 23:31 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-11 11:57 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2007-07-11 12:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-07-11 15:48 ` Theodore Tso
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070711115716.GU6417@schatzie.adilger.int \
--to=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).