linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>
To: miklos@szeredi.hu
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Al Viro <viro@ftp.linux.org.uk>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] VFS: allow filesystem to override mknod capability checks
Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2007 14:20:45 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070809192045.GA16682@vino.hallyn.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070809152909.203254312@szeredi.hu>

Quoting miklos@szeredi.hu (miklos@szeredi.hu):
> From: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
> 
> Add a new filesystem flag, that results in the VFS not checking if the
> current process has enough privileges to do an mknod().
> 
> This is needed on filesystems, where an unprivileged user may be able
> to create a device node, without causing security problems.
> 
> One such example is "mountlo" a loopback mount utility implemented
> with fuse and UML, which runs as an unprivileged userspace process.
> In this case the user does in fact have the right to create device
> nodes within the filesystem image, as long as the user has write
> access to the image.  Since the filesystem is mounted with "nodev",
> adding device nodes is not a security concern.

Could we enforce at do_new_mount() that if
type->fs_flags&FS_MKNOD_CHECKS_PERM then mnt_flags |= MS_NODEV?

> This feature is basically "fuse-only", so it does not make sense to
> change the semantics of ->mknod().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz>
> ---
> 
> Index: linux/fs/namei.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/fs/namei.c	2007-08-09 16:49:07.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux/fs/namei.c	2007-08-09 16:49:12.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1921,7 +1921,8 @@ int vfs_mknod(struct inode *dir, struct 
>  	if (error)
>  		return error;
>  
> -	if ((S_ISCHR(mode) || S_ISBLK(mode)) && !capable(CAP_MKNOD))
> +	if (!(dir->i_sb->s_type->fs_flags & FS_MKNOD_CHECKS_PERM) &&
> +	    (S_ISCHR(mode) || S_ISBLK(mode)) && !capable(CAP_MKNOD))
>  		return -EPERM;
>  
>  	if (!dir->i_op || !dir->i_op->mknod)
> Index: linux/include/linux/fs.h
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/include/linux/fs.h	2007-08-09 16:49:07.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux/include/linux/fs.h	2007-08-09 16:49:12.000000000 +0200
> @@ -97,6 +97,7 @@ extern int dir_notify_enable;
>  #define FS_BINARY_MOUNTDATA 2
>  #define FS_HAS_SUBTYPE 4
>  #define FS_SAFE 8		/* Safe to mount by unprivileged users */
> +#define FS_MKNOD_CHECKS_PERM 16	/* FS checks if device creation is allowed */
>  #define FS_REVAL_DOT	16384	/* Check the paths ".", ".." for staleness */
>  #define FS_RENAME_DOES_D_MOVE	32768	/* FS will handle d_move()
>  					 * during rename() internally.
> 
> --
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  reply	other threads:[~2007-08-09 19:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-09 15:27 [RFC PATCH 0/4] VFS updates miklos
2007-08-09 15:27 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] pass open file to ->setattr() miklos
2007-08-09 15:35   ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-08-09 15:41     ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-09 15:27 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] pass open file to ->getattr() miklos
2007-08-09 15:27 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] allow filesystems to implement atomic open+truncate miklos
2007-08-09 15:27 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] VFS: allow filesystem to override mknod capability checks miklos
2007-08-09 19:20   ` Serge E. Hallyn [this message]
2007-08-09 20:10     ` Miklos Szeredi
2007-08-10 14:44       ` Serge E. Hallyn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20070809192045.GA16682@vino.hallyn.com \
    --to=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).