From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdeve
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] writeback: 3-queue based writeback schedule
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:05:34 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070810170534.GA5137__16093.9251808033$1186765580$gmane$org@mail.ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
Message-ID: <20070810170534.GA5137@mail.ustc.edu.cn> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070810164715.GA5508@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:47:15AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> In fact s_more_io is no longer necessary. We end up with a priority
Ah sorry, s_more_io is still needed to keep the time-ordering. I was
thinking of schedule fairness, in which sense only one cyclic list
will be sufficient.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-10 17:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070810063412.238042387@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-10 6:34 ` [PATCH 0/4] [RFC][PATCH] fs-writeback: redefining the dirty inode queues Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10 6:34 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070810063419.454829766@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-10 6:34 ` [PATCH 1/4] writeback: check time-ordering of s_io and s_more_io Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10 6:34 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070810063419.549052142@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-10 6:34 ` [PATCH 2/4] writeback: 3-queue based writeback schedule Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10 6:34 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070810164715.GA5508@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-10 16:47 ` Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10 16:47 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070810170534.GA5137@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-10 17:05 ` Fengguang Wu [this message]
[not found] ` <20070810063419.657077419@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-10 6:34 ` [PATCH 3/4] writeback: function renames and cleanups Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10 6:34 ` Fengguang Wu
[not found] ` <20070810063419.786586676@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
2007-08-10 6:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] writeback: fix ntfs with sb_has_dirty_inodes() Fengguang Wu
2007-08-10 6:34 ` Fengguang Wu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='20070810170534.GA5137__16093.9251808033$1186765580$gmane$org@mail.ustc.edu.cn' \
--to=wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=kenchen@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).