From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Fengguang Wu <wfg@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] writeback: 3-queue based writeback schedule
Date: Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:05:34 +0800
Message-ID: <20070810170534.GA5137__16093.9251808033$1186765580$gmane$org@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
References: <20070810063412.238042387@mail.ustc.edu.cn> <20070810063419.549052142@mail.ustc.edu.cn> <20070810164715.GA5508@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>, Ken Chen <kenchen@google.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdeve
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp.ustc.edu.cn ([202.38.64.16]:54885 "HELO ustc.edu.cn"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP
	id S1759908AbXHJRFi (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Fri, 10 Aug 2007 13:05:38 -0400
Message-ID: <20070810170534.GA5137@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20070810164715.GA5508@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Sat, Aug 11, 2007 at 12:47:15AM +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
> In fact s_more_io is no longer necessary. We end up with a priority

Ah sorry, s_more_io is still needed to keep the time-ordering. I was
thinking of schedule fairness, in which sense only one cyclic list
will be sufficient.