From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, sds@tycho.nsa.gov,
casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adding a security parameter to VFS functions
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:36:33 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708170036.34276.agruen@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29015.1187178055@redhat.com>
On Wednesday 15 August 2007 13:40, David Howells wrote:
>
> Hi Linus, Al,
>
> Would you object greatly to functions like vfs_mkdir() gaining a security
> parameter? What I'm thinking of is this:
>
> int vfs_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int mode,
> struct security *security)
>
> Where the security context is the state of the context at the time the call
> was issued:
>
> struct security {
> uid_t fsuid;
> git_t fsgid;
> struct group_info *group_info;
> void *security;
> struct key *session_keyring;
> struct key *process_keyring;
> struct key *thread_keyring;
>
> And perhaps:
>
> struct audit_context *audit_context;
> seccomp_t seccomp;
> };
>
> This would, for the most part, be a temporary affair, being set up by such
> as sys_mkdir()/sys_mkdirat() from data held in task_struct.
That's additional setup work unless that struct can be embedded in
task_struct. We would be complicating the common / fast / local case to
simplify the not-so-common case or cases.
-- Andreas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-16 22:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-15 11:40 Adding a security parameter to VFS functions David Howells
2007-08-15 16:23 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-08-15 16:52 ` David Howells
2007-08-16 22:20 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-08-16 22:36 ` Andreas Gruenbacher [this message]
2007-08-16 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-16 23:30 ` Kyle Moffett
2007-08-16 23:34 ` Al Viro
2007-08-17 18:05 ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-08-20 12:09 ` David Howells
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200708170036.34276.agruen@suse.de \
--to=agruen@suse.de \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
--cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).