linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruen@suse.de>
To: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: torvalds@osdl.org, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, sds@tycho.nsa.gov,
	casey@schaufler-ca.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
	nfsv4@linux-nfs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	selinux@tycho.nsa.gov, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Adding a security parameter to VFS functions
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 00:36:33 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200708170036.34276.agruen@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <29015.1187178055@redhat.com>

On Wednesday 15 August 2007 13:40, David Howells wrote:
> 
> Hi Linus, Al,
> 
> Would you object greatly to functions like vfs_mkdir() gaining a security
> parameter?  What I'm thinking of is this:
> 
> 	int vfs_mkdir(struct inode *dir, struct dentry *dentry, int mode,
> 		      struct security *security)
> 
> Where the security context is the state of the context at the time the call
> was issued:
> 
> 	struct security {
> 		uid_t			fsuid;
> 		git_t			fsgid;
> 		struct group_info	*group_info;
> 		void			*security;
> 		struct key		*session_keyring;
> 		struct key		*process_keyring;
> 		struct key		*thread_keyring;
> 
> And perhaps:
> 
> 		struct audit_context	*audit_context;
> 		seccomp_t		seccomp;
> 	};
> 
> This would, for the most part, be a temporary affair, being set up by such
> as sys_mkdir()/sys_mkdirat() from data held in task_struct.

That's additional setup work unless that struct can be embedded in 
task_struct. We would be complicating the common / fast / local case to 
simplify the not-so-common case or cases.

-- Andreas

  parent reply	other threads:[~2007-08-16 22:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-08-15 11:40 Adding a security parameter to VFS functions David Howells
2007-08-15 16:23 ` Casey Schaufler
2007-08-15 16:52   ` David Howells
2007-08-16 22:20   ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-08-16 22:36 ` Andreas Gruenbacher [this message]
2007-08-16 22:57 ` Linus Torvalds
2007-08-16 23:30   ` Kyle Moffett
2007-08-16 23:34   ` Al Viro
2007-08-17 18:05     ` Andreas Gruenbacher
2007-08-20 12:09 ` David Howells

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200708170036.34276.agruen@suse.de \
    --to=agruen@suse.de \
    --cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nfsv4@linux-nfs.org \
    --cc=sds@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=selinux@tycho.nsa.gov \
    --cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
    --cc=viro@ftp.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).