From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com>
Cc: Stephen Tweedie <sct@redhat.com>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] avoid clobbering registers with J_ASSERT macro
Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2007 13:54:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070817135402.d7246766.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <46C5380A.8080109@redhat.com>
On Fri, 17 Aug 2007 01:54:18 -0400
Chris Snook <csnook@redhat.com> wrote:
> The J_ASSERT() macro in jbd and jbd2 calls printk() prior to BUG(). While this
> makes it more convenient to read the assertion failure, it also clobbers
> registers, which can sometimes make debugging harder, which is clearly not the
> intended purpose. I recently banged my head on this myself.
>
> The following patches to jbd and jbd2 enable the printk only if
> CONFIG_JBD[2]_DEBUG is set. Otherwise, it will simply BUG if the condition is
> violated. This way test kernels still get the benefit of the J_ASSERT printk,
> while production kernels, which come from a more stable source base where it's
> easier to trace line numbers back to specific lines of code, simply get the BUG,
> with all registers preserved.
>
> This is, of course, not the only way of fixing this problem, but it seems to be
> the least invasive way, which is why I'm proposing these patches.
How's about we just remove that printk? Do
#define J_ASSERT(e) BUG_ON(e)?
The rest of the kernel seems to be able to cope with that...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-17 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-17 5:54 [RFC PATCH 0/2] avoid clobbering registers with J_ASSERT macro Chris Snook
2007-08-17 6:02 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] jbd: " Chris Snook
2007-08-17 6:04 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] jbd2: " Chris Snook
2007-08-17 20:54 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-08-20 13:18 ` [RFC PATCH 0/2] " Chris Snook
2007-08-20 15:22 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
2007-08-20 15:46 ` Matthew Wilcox
2007-08-20 16:19 ` Stephen C. Tweedie
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070817135402.d7246766.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=csnook@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sct@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).