* Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc6: known regressions
[not found] ` <46E81ACE.6030305@googlemail.com>
@ 2007-09-12 17:36 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-09-13 12:18 ` [Jfs-discussion] " Dave Kleikamp
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andy Whitcroft @ 2007-09-12 17:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Piotrowski
Cc: Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, LKML, linux-fsdevel, nfs,
Trond Myklebust, Andrew Clayton, Daniel J Blueman, Dave Kleikamp,
jfs-discussion, sct, adilger, linux-ext4, linux-acpi, Len Brown,
Chuck Ebbert, dth
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 06:58:54PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> FS
>
> Subject : hanging ext3 dbench tests
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/11/176
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
> Caused-By : ?
> Handled-By : ?
> Status : unknown
A number of attempts to reproduce this on these machines has yet to
re-trigger it. I guess the Status is therefore "under test --
unreproducible at present"
-apw
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [Jfs-discussion] [2/4] 2.6.23-rc6: known regressions
[not found] ` <46E81ACE.6030305@googlemail.com>
2007-09-12 17:36 ` Andy Whitcroft
@ 2007-09-13 12:18 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-09-19 11:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-09-14 16:51 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2007-09-14 17:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dave Kleikamp @ 2007-09-13 12:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Piotrowski
Cc: Linus Torvalds, jfs-discussion, LKML, linux-fsdevel,
Andrew Morton, Oliver Neukum
On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 18:58 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Subject : umount triggers a warning in jfs and takes almost a minute
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/4/73
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
> Caused-By : ?
> Handled-By : ?
> Status : unknown
I'm still waiting to hear from Oliver whether or not this is actually a
regression.
Thanks,
Shaggy
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [Jfs-discussion] [2/4] 2.6.23-rc6: known regressions
2007-09-13 12:18 ` [Jfs-discussion] " Dave Kleikamp
@ 2007-09-19 11:44 ` Oliver Neukum
2007-09-19 12:36 ` Dave Kleikamp
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Neukum @ 2007-09-19 11:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Dave Kleikamp
Cc: Michal Piotrowski, Linus Torvalds, jfs-discussion, LKML,
linux-fsdevel, Andrew Morton
Am Donnerstag 13 September 2007 schrieb Dave Kleikamp:
> On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 18:58 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
>
> > Subject : umount triggers a warning in jfs and takes almost a minute
> > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/4/73
> > Last known good : ?
> > Submitter : Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
> > Caused-By : ?
> > Handled-By : ?
> > Status : unknown
>
> I'm still waiting to hear from Oliver whether or not this is actually a
> regression.
OK, I've done test. On 2.6.22 I was unable to trigger the warning.
On 2.6.23-rc6 I get the following warning in about 3/4 of all unmounts:
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: WARNING: at fs/jfs/jfs_logmgr.c:1643 jfs_flush_journal()
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel:
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: Call Trace:
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8860f962>] :jfs:jfs_flush_journal+0x26a/0x27d
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8029fca1>] dispose_list+0xde/0xf7
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff885fd003>] :jfs:jfs_umount+0x30/0xe5
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff885f9a31>] :jfs:jfs_put_super+0xd/0x5e
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8028ef8f>] generic_shutdown_super+0x60/0xf0
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8028f02c>] kill_block_super+0xd/0x1e
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8028f0f7>] deactivate_super+0x6a/0x82
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff802a2184>] sys_umount+0x249/0x25a
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff802616ff>] audit_syscall_entry+0x141/0x174
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8020be8c>] tracesys+0xdc/0xe1
Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel:
This is on a partition of a usb mass storage device with 2K sector size.
IMHO it is a regression. I am recompiling with CONFIG_JFS_DEBUG.
Regards
Oliver
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [Jfs-discussion] [2/4] 2.6.23-rc6: known regressions
2007-09-19 11:44 ` Oliver Neukum
@ 2007-09-19 12:36 ` Dave Kleikamp
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Dave Kleikamp @ 2007-09-19 12:36 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Oliver Neukum
Cc: Michal Piotrowski, Linus Torvalds, jfs-discussion, LKML,
linux-fsdevel, Andrew Morton
On Wed, 2007-09-19 at 13:44 +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Donnerstag 13 September 2007 schrieb Dave Kleikamp:
> > On Wed, 2007-09-12 at 18:58 +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> >
> > > Subject : umount triggers a warning in jfs and takes almost a minute
> > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/4/73
> > > Last known good : ?
> > > Submitter : Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
> > > Caused-By : ?
> > > Handled-By : ?
> > > Status : unknown
> >
> > I'm still waiting to hear from Oliver whether or not this is actually a
> > regression.
>
> OK, I've done test. On 2.6.22 I was unable to trigger the warning.
> On 2.6.23-rc6 I get the following warning in about 3/4 of all unmounts:
>
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: WARNING: at fs/jfs/jfs_logmgr.c:1643 jfs_flush_journal()
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel:
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: Call Trace:
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8860f962>] :jfs:jfs_flush_journal+0x26a/0x27d
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8029fca1>] dispose_list+0xde/0xf7
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff885fd003>] :jfs:jfs_umount+0x30/0xe5
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff885f9a31>] :jfs:jfs_put_super+0xd/0x5e
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8028ef8f>] generic_shutdown_super+0x60/0xf0
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8028f02c>] kill_block_super+0xd/0x1e
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8028f0f7>] deactivate_super+0x6a/0x82
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff802a2184>] sys_umount+0x249/0x25a
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff802616ff>] audit_syscall_entry+0x141/0x174
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel: [<ffffffff8020be8c>] tracesys+0xdc/0xe1
> Sep 19 13:08:04 oenone kernel:
>
> This is on a partition of a usb mass storage device with 2K sector size.
> IMHO it is a regression. I am recompiling with CONFIG_JFS_DEBUG.
Looks like a regression then. I'll take a look at the debug output and get back to you.
Shaggy
--
David Kleikamp
IBM Linux Technology Center
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc6: known regressions
[not found] ` <46E81ACE.6030305@googlemail.com>
2007-09-12 17:36 ` Andy Whitcroft
2007-09-13 12:18 ` [Jfs-discussion] " Dave Kleikamp
@ 2007-09-14 16:51 ` Kamalesh Babulal
2007-09-14 17:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Kamalesh Babulal @ 2007-09-14 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Piotrowski
Cc: Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, LKML, linux-fsdevel, nfs,
Trond Myklebust, Andrew Clayton, Daniel J Blueman, Dave Kleikamp,
jfs-discussion, Andy Whitcroft, sct, adilger, linux-ext4,
linux-acpi, Len Brown, Chuck Ebbert, dth
Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Here is a list of some known regressions in 2.6.23-rc6.
>
> Feel free to add new regressions/remove fixed etc.
> http://kernelnewbies.org/known_regressions
>
> List of Aces
>
> Name Regressions fixed since 21-Jun-2007
> Adrian Bunk 10
> Linus Torvalds 6
> Alan Stern 5
> Andi Kleen 5
> Hugh Dickins 5
> Trond Myklebust 5
> Andrew Morton 4
> Al Viro 3
> Alexey Starikovskiy 3
> Cornelia Huck 3
> David S. Miller 3
> Jens Axboe 3
> Stephen Hemminger 3
> Tejun Heo 3
>
>
>
> ACPI
>
> Subject : 2.6.23-rc5 hangs on boot, apparently when initializing the EC
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/11/369
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com>
> Caused-By : ?
> Handled-By : ?
> Status : unknown
>
>
>
> CPUFREQ
>
> Subject : ide problems: 2.6.22-git17 working, 2.6.23-rc1* is not
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/27/298
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/7/29/371
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : dth <dth@dth.net>
> Caused-By : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> commit f79e3185dd0f8650022518d7624c876d8929061b
> Handled-By : Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>
> Status : problem is being debugged
>
>
>
> FS
>
> Subject : hanging ext3 dbench tests
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/11/176
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
> Caused-By : ?
> Handled-By : ?
> Status : unknown
>
> Subject : umount triggers a warning in jfs and takes almost a minute
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/4/73
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Oliver Neukum <oliver@neukum.org>
> Caused-By : ?
> Handled-By : ?
> Status : unknown
>
> Subject : [NFSv4] 2.6.23-rc4 oops in nfs4_cb_recall
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/4/53
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9003
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
> Caused-By : ?
> Handled-By : ?
> Workaround : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12797
> Status : unknown
>
> Subject : [NFSD OOPS] 2.6.23-rc1-git10
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/2/462
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Andrew Clayton <andrew@digital-domain.net>
> Caused-By : ?
> Handled-By : ?
> Status : unknown
>
>
>
> Regards,
> Michal
>
> --
> LOG
> http://www.stardust.webpages.pl/log/
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
Hi Michal,
The NFSV4 [BUG] 2.6.23-rc5 kernel BUG at fs/nfs/nfs4xdr.c:945, is again
seen in 2.6.23-rc6. Can this bug be added as known regression for
2.6.23-rc6. References http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/7/27.
--
Thanks & Regards,
Kamalesh Babulal,
Linux Technology Center,
IBM, ISTL.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread* Re: [2/4] 2.6.23-rc6: known regressions
[not found] ` <46E81ACE.6030305@googlemail.com>
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2007-09-14 16:51 ` Kamalesh Babulal
@ 2007-09-14 17:21 ` J. Bruce Fields
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: J. Bruce Fields @ 2007-09-14 17:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michal Piotrowski
Cc: Linus Torvalds, Andrew Morton, LKML, linux-fsdevel, nfs,
Trond Myklebust, Andrew Clayton, Daniel J Blueman, Dave Kleikamp,
jfs-discussion, Andy Whitcroft, sct, adilger, linux-ext4,
linux-acpi, Len Brown, Chuck Ebbert, dth, Neil Brown
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 06:58:54PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
> Subject : [NFSv4] 2.6.23-rc4 oops in nfs4_cb_recall
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/4/53
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9003
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Daniel J Blueman <daniel.blueman@gmail.com>
> Caused-By : ?
> Handled-By : ?
> Workaround : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=12797
> Status : unknown
I have patches which fix this, which we're testing. (See bugzilla.)
It's a long-standing bug, not a regression.
> Subject : [NFSD OOPS] 2.6.23-rc1-git10
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/2/462
> Last known good : ?
> Submitter : Andrew Clayton <andrew@digital-domain.net>
> Caused-By : ?
> Handled-By : ?
> Status : unknown
Neil's working on this. Also not a regression.
--b.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread