From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] JBD slab cleanups Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 10:04:08 +0100 Message-ID: <20070918090407.GA671@infradead.org> References: <20070902152801.GA19962@infradead.org> <20070903134043.GB28962@infradead.org> <20070903193308.GA7771@infradead.org> <1189796027.3841.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1190057391.3845.22.camel@localhost.localdomain> <1190066466.31220.5.camel@dyn9047017100.beaverton.ibm.com> <1190069851.6725.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Badari Pulavarty , Christoph Hellwig , Christoph Lameter , linux-fsdevel , ext4 development , lkml To: Mingming Cao Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:45689 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753206AbXIRJEO (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Sep 2007 05:04:14 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1190069851.6725.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 17, 2007 at 03:57:31PM -0700, Mingming Cao wrote: > Here is the incremental small cleanup patch. > > Remove kamlloc usages in jbd/jbd2 and consistently use jbd_kmalloc/jbd2_malloc. Shouldn't we kill jbd_kmalloc instead?