From: Andreas Dilger <adilger@clusterfs.com>
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
ext4 development <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] JBD: use GFP_NOFS in kmalloc
Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 22:25:21 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070920042521.GU32520@schatzie.adilger.int> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1190229729.4318.19.camel@localhost.localdomain>
On Sep 19, 2007 12:22 -0700, Mingming Cao wrote:
> Convert the GFP_KERNEL flag used in JBD/JBD2 to GFP_NOFS, consistent
> with the rest of kmalloc flag used in the JBD/JBD2 layer.
>
> @@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ static journal_t * journal_init_common (
> - journal = kmalloc(sizeof(*journal), GFP_KERNEL);
> + journal = kmalloc(sizeof(*journal), GFP_NOFS);
> @@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ journal_t * journal_init_dev(struct bloc
> - journal->j_wbuf = kmalloc(n * sizeof(struct buffer_head*), GFP_KERNEL);
> + journal->j_wbuf = kmalloc(n * sizeof(struct buffer_head*), GFP_NOFS);
> @@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ journal_t * journal_init_inode (struct i
> - journal->j_wbuf = kmalloc(n * sizeof(struct buffer_head*), GFP_KERNEL);
> + journal->j_wbuf = kmalloc(n * sizeof(struct buffer_head*), GFP_NOFS);
Is there a reason for this change except "it's in a filesystem, so it
should be GFP_NOFS"? We are only doing journal setup during mount so
there shouldn't be any problem using GFP_KERNEL. I don't think it will
inject any defect into the code, but I don't think it is needed either.
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-20 4:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20070828190551.415127746@sgi.com>
[not found] ` <20070828190735.292638294@sgi.com>
2007-08-30 0:11 ` [31/36] Large Blocksize: Core piece Mingming Cao
2007-08-30 0:12 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-30 0:47 ` [RFC 1/4] Large Blocksize support for Ext2/3/4 Mingming Cao
2007-08-30 0:59 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-01 0:01 ` Mingming Cao
2007-09-01 0:12 ` [RFC 1/2] JBD: slab management support for large block(>8k) Mingming Cao
2007-09-01 18:39 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-09-02 11:40 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-02 15:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-09-03 7:55 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-03 13:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-09-03 19:31 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-03 19:33 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-09-14 18:53 ` [PATCH] JBD slab cleanups Mingming Cao
2007-09-14 18:58 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-09-17 19:29 ` Mingming Cao
2007-09-17 19:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-09-17 22:01 ` Badari Pulavarty
2007-09-17 22:57 ` Mingming Cao
2007-09-18 9:04 ` Christoph Hellwig
2007-09-18 16:35 ` Mingming Cao
2007-09-18 18:04 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-09-19 1:00 ` Mingming Cao
2007-09-19 2:19 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-19 19:15 ` Mingming Cao
2007-09-19 19:22 ` [PATCH] JBD: use GFP_NOFS in kmalloc Mingming Cao
2007-09-19 21:34 ` Andrew Morton
2007-09-19 21:55 ` Mingming Cao
2007-09-20 4:25 ` Andreas Dilger [this message]
2007-09-19 19:26 ` [PATCH] JBD slab cleanups Dave Kleikamp
2007-09-19 19:28 ` Dave Kleikamp
2007-09-19 20:47 ` Mingming Cao
2007-09-19 19:48 ` Andreas Dilger
2007-09-19 22:03 ` Mingming Cao
2007-09-01 0:12 ` [RFC 2/2] JBD: blocks reservation fix for large block support Mingming Cao
2007-08-30 0:47 ` [RFC 2/4]ext2: fix rec_len overflow with 64KB block size Mingming Cao
[not found] ` <20070828190730.220393749@sgi.com>
2007-08-30 9:20 ` [11/36] Use page_cache_xxx in fs/buffer.c Dmitry Monakhov
2007-08-30 18:14 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-31 1:47 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-31 6:56 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-31 7:03 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-31 7:11 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-31 7:17 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-31 7:26 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-31 7:33 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-31 7:43 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-31 7:52 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-31 8:12 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-31 15:22 ` Christoph Lameter
2007-08-31 16:35 ` Jörn Engel
2007-08-31 19:00 ` Jens Axboe
2007-08-31 8:36 ` Dmitry Monakhov
2007-08-31 15:28 ` Christoph Lameter
[not found] ` <20070828192034.GA13883@lst.de>
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.64.0708281254070.16473@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
2007-09-01 1:11 ` [00/36] Large Blocksize Support V6 Christoph Lameter
2007-09-01 19:17 ` Peter Zijlstra
2007-09-02 11:44 ` Christoph Lameter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070920042521.GU32520@schatzie.adilger.int \
--to=adilger@clusterfs.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cmm@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).