From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] VFS: new fgetattr() file operation Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 13:36:40 +0100 Message-ID: <20070924123640.GA17409@infradead.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: hch@infradead.org, trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no, adilger@clusterfs.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Miklos Szeredi Return-path: Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:40200 "EHLO pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755257AbXIXMgp (ORCPT ); Mon, 24 Sep 2007 08:36:45 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 02:24:54PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote: > Thanks to everyone for the feedback. Here's two of the VFS patches > reworked according to comments. I also plan to rework the setattr() > patch accordingly and perhaps the xattr patch, altough that is the > lowest priority. > > Christoph, are these OK with you in this form? Not at all. Attribute operations like this have no business at all looking at the struct file. Please fix your dreaded filesystem to implement proper unix semantics intead, and if that means adding silly rename support so be it.