From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
Subject: [patch 0/4] 64k pagesize/blocksize fixes
Date: Tue, 25 Sep 2007 16:30:49 -0700
Message-ID: <20070925233049.656803267@sgi.com>
Cc: Takashi Sato <sho@tnes.nec.co.jp>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Mingming Cao <cmm@us.ibm.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from netops-testserver-3-out.sgi.com ([192.48.171.28]:35575 "EHLO
	relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751151AbXIYXfB (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 25 Sep 2007 19:35:01 -0400
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

Attached the fixes necessary to support 64k pagesize/blocksize. I think these are useful
independent of the large blocksize patchset since there are architectures that support
64k page size and that could use these large buffer sizes without the large buffersize
patchset.

Are these patches in the right shape to be merged? I rediffed these against 2.6.32-rc8-mm1.

I had to fix some things in the second patch (ext2) that may need some review since the
way that commits work changed.

--