From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Siddha, Suresh B" Subject: Re: SLUB performance regression vs SLAB Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:46:04 -0700 Message-ID: <20071004194604.GA27824@linux-os.sc.intel.com> References: <200709280742.38262.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <200709281514.48293.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au> <20071004161621.GO12049@parisc-linux.org> <20071004183224.GA8641@linux.intel.com> <20071004192824.GA9852@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Nick Piggin , Christoph Hellwig , Mel Gorman , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, David Chinner , Jens Axboe , suresh.b.siddha@intel.com To: Christoph Lameter Return-path: Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:2022 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754818AbXJDTqw (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Oct 2007 15:46:52 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 12:05:35PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote: > > > Was the page allocator pass through patchset > > > separately applied as I requested? > > > > I don't believe so. Suresh? > > If it was a git pull then the pass through was included and never taken > out. It was a git pull from the performance branch that you pointed out earlier http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/christoph/slab.git;a=log;h=performance and the config is based on EL5 config with just the SLUB turned on.