From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sam Ravnborg Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/32] Add an ERR_CAST() macro to complement ERR_PTR and co. [try #2] Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 18:07:50 +0200 Message-ID: <20071005160750.GA31413@uranus.ravnborg.org> References: <20071005144605.GA3072@infradead.org> <20071004155602.2814.47731.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <20071004155607.2814.74947.stgit@warthog.procyon.org.uk> <17643.1191599256@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Christoph Hellwig , viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, torvalds@osdl.org, akpm@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: David Howells Return-path: Received: from pasmtpb.tele.dk ([80.160.77.98]:60955 "EHLO pasmtpB.tele.dk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756126AbXJEQGr (ORCPT ); Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:06:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <17643.1191599256@redhat.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Oct 05, 2007 at 04:47:36PM +0100, David Howells wrote: > Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > I don't like this one very much, I'd rather take the variant Linus > > outline in his last post on that topic.. > > I'd rather not take that variant. One like one variant, another like another variant. Both fails to say why. So you left everyone wondering..... Sam