From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
ryan@finnie.org, cjwatson@ubuntu.com, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: msync(2) bug(?), returns AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE to userland
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 14:47:40 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20071011144740.136b31a8.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200710071920.l97JKJX5018871@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 15:20:19 -0400
Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu> wrote:
> According to vfs.txt, ->writepage() may return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE back
> to the VFS/VM. Indeed some filesystems such as tmpfs can return
> AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE; and stackable file systems (e.g., Unionfs) also
> return AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE if the lower f/s returned it.
>
> Anyway, some Ubuntu users of Unionfs reported that msync(2) sometimes
> returns AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE (decimal 524288) back to userland.
> Therefore, some user programs fail, esp. if they're written such as this:
>
> err = msync(...);
> if (err != 0)
> // fail
>
> They temporarily fixed the specific program in question (apt-get) to check
>
> if (err < 0)
> // fail
>
> Is this a bug indeed, or are user programs supposed to handle
> AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE (I hope not the latter). If it's a kernel bug, what
> should the kernel return: a zero, or an -errno (and which one)?
>
shit. That's a nasty bug. Really userspace should be testing for -1, but
the msync() library function should only ever return 0 or -1.
Does this fix it?
--- a/mm/page-writeback.c~a
+++ a/mm/page-writeback.c
@@ -850,8 +850,10 @@ retry:
ret = (*writepage)(page, wbc, data);
- if (unlikely(ret == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE))
+ if (unlikely(ret == AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE)) {
unlock_page(page);
+ ret = 0;
+ }
if (ret || (--(wbc->nr_to_write) <= 0))
done = 1;
if (wbc->nonblocking && bdi_write_congested(bdi)) {
_
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-11 21:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-07 19:20 msync(2) bug(?), returns AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE to userland Erez Zadok
2007-10-11 21:47 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2007-10-11 22:12 ` Ryan Finnie
2007-10-12 0:38 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-12 21:45 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-10-14 8:44 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-14 17:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-10-14 17:23 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-14 17:50 ` Pekka J Enberg
2007-10-14 22:32 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-15 11:47 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-10-16 18:02 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-22 20:16 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-22 20:48 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-10-25 15:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-25 16:44 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-25 18:23 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-26 2:00 ` Neil Brown
2007-10-26 8:09 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-10-26 11:26 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-26 8:05 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-10-22 21:04 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-25 16:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-24 21:02 ` [PATCH] fix tmpfs BUG and AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE Hugh Dickins
2007-10-24 21:08 ` Andrew Morton
2007-10-24 21:37 ` [PATCH+comment] " Hugh Dickins
2007-10-25 5:37 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-10-25 6:30 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-25 7:24 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-10-25 16:01 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-25 20:51 ` H. Peter Anvin
2007-10-22 20:01 ` msync(2) bug(?), returns AOP_WRITEPAGE_ACTIVATE to userland Hugh Dickins
2007-10-22 20:40 ` Pekka Enberg
2007-10-22 19:42 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-22 21:38 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-25 18:03 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-27 20:47 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-28 20:23 ` Erez Zadok
2007-10-29 20:33 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-10-31 23:53 ` Erez Zadok
2007-11-05 15:40 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-11-05 16:38 ` Dave Hansen
2007-11-05 18:57 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-11-09 2:47 ` Erez Zadok
2007-11-09 6:05 ` Erez Zadok
2007-11-12 5:41 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-11-12 17:01 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-11-13 10:18 ` Erez Zadok
2007-11-17 21:24 ` Hugh Dickins
2007-11-20 1:30 ` Erez Zadok
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2007-10-07 19:58 Pekka J Enberg
2007-10-08 1:58 ` Ryan Finnie
2007-10-08 11:18 ` Pekka Enberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20071011144740.136b31a8.akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=cjwatson@ubuntu.com \
--cc=ezk@cs.sunysb.edu \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=ryan@finnie.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).