From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Mason Subject: More Large blocksize benchmarks Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:22:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20071016002231.GA21378@think.oraclecorp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Linus Torvalds , Nathan Scott , Andrea Arcangeli , Nick Piggin , Christoph Lameter , Mel Gorman , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig , William Lee Irwin III , Jens Axboe , Badari Pulavarty , Maxim Levitsky , Fengguang Wu , swin wang , totty.lu@gmail.com, hugh@veritas.com, joern@lazybastard.org To: David Chinner Return-path: Received: from rgminet01.oracle.com ([148.87.113.118]:30826 "EHLO rgminet01.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752701AbXJPAY4 (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Oct 2007 20:24:56 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Hello everyone, I'm stealing the cc list and reviving and old thread because I've finally got some numbers to go along with the Btrfs variable blocksize feature. The basic idea is to create a read/write interface to map a range of bytes on the address space, and use it in Btrfs for all metadata operations (file operations have always been extent based). So, instead of casting buffer_head->b_data to some structure, I read and write at offsets in a struct extent_buffer. The extent buffer is very small and backed by an address space, and I get large block sizes the same way file_write gets to write to 16k at a time, by finding the appropriate page in the addess space. This is an over simplification since I try to cache these mapping decisions to avoid using too much CPU, but hopefully you get the idea. The advantage to this approach is the changes are all inside Btrfs. No extra kernel patches were required. Dave reported that XFS saw much higher write throughput with large blocksizes, but so far I'm seeing the most benefits during reads. The next step is a bunch more benchmarks. I've done the first round and posted it here: http://oss.oracle.com/~mason/blocksizes/ The Btrfs code makes it relatively easy to experiment, and so this may be a good step toward figuring out if some automagic solution is worth it in general. I can even use different sizes for nodes and leaves, although I haven't done much testing at all there yet. -chris