From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Randy Dunlap Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] VFS: swap do_ioctl and vfs_ioctl names Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:16:50 -0700 Message-ID: <20071030101650.73007bde.rdunlap@xenotime.net> References: <11936184581182-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu> <11936184592699-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu> <20071030095653.GC22413@infradead.org> <20071030082240.1ad71e6c.rdunlap@xenotime.net> <20071030171436.GA15922@infradead.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Erez Zadok , viro@ftp.linux.org.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Christoph Hellwig Return-path: Received: from xenotime.net ([66.160.160.81]:56436 "HELO xenotime.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1752264AbXJ3RQx (ORCPT ); Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:16:53 -0400 Received: from midway.site ([71.117.233.180]) by xenotime.net for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:16:50 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20071030171436.GA15922@infradead.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:14:36 +0000 Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 08:22:40AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote: > > They are just treated as part of the parameter explanation text. > > I don't see any problem with them. > > Well, it's completely inconsistant with any other kerneldoc.. True. and it has an advantage. --- ~Randy