From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] VFS: swap do_ioctl and vfs_ioctl names
Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2007 17:14:36 +0000
Message-ID: <20071030171436.GA15922@infradead.org>
References: <11936184581182-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu> <11936184592699-git-send-email-ezk@cs.sunysb.edu> <20071030095653.GC22413@infradead.org> <20071030082240.1ad71e6c.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Erez Zadok <ezk@cs.sunysb.edu>, viro@ftp.linux.org.uk,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from pentafluge.infradead.org ([213.146.154.40]:46905 "EHLO
	pentafluge.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751558AbXJ3ROn (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 30 Oct 2007 13:14:43 -0400
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20071030082240.1ad71e6c.rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 08:22:40AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> They are just treated as part of the parameter explanation text.
> I don't see any problem with them.

Well, it's completely inconsistant with any other kerneldoc..