From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 18/19] Use page_cache_xxx for fs/xfs
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 00:24:04 -0800
Message-ID: <20071129002404.dc4c9cae.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
References: <20071129011052.866354847@sgi.com>
	<20071129011148.509714554@sgi.com>
	<20071129030314.GR119954183@sgi.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0711281927520.20367@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
	<20071129035833.GY119954183@sgi.com>
	<Pine.LNX.4.64.0711282006140.20688@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
	<20071129041013.GF119954183@sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Mel Gorman <mel@skynet.ie>,
	William Lee Irwin III <wli@holomorphy.com>,
	Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@oracle.com>,
	Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@gmail.com>,
	Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@gmail.com>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@gmail.com>,
	swin wang <wangswin@gmail.com>, totty.lu@gmail.com,
	hugh@veritas.com, joern@lazybastard.org
To: David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from smtp2.linux-foundation.org ([207.189.120.14]:53097 "EHLO
	smtp2.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754209AbXK2I0G (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 29 Nov 2007 03:26:06 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20071129041013.GF119954183@sgi.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org

On Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:10:13 +1100 David Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:06:30PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Is this correct?
> 
> Yup, looks good now.
> 

Given the error rate in the xfs patch my confidence in the rest
of the series isn't terribly high, sorry.

I guess I can suck up the core and xfs bits, but who is going to 
review the rest of them this closely?