From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Chinner Subject: Re: [patch 14/19] Use page_cache_xxx in ext2 Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2007 15:19:50 +1100 Message-ID: <20071129041950.GH119954183@sgi.com> References: <20071129011052.866354847@sgi.com> <20071129011147.567317218@sgi.com> <20071129034521.GV119954183@sgi.com> <20071129040659.GC119954183@sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Chinner , akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Christoph Hellwig , Mel Gorman , William Lee Irwin III , Jens Axboe , Badari Pulavarty , Maxim Levitsky , Fengguang Wu , swin wang , totty.lu@gmail.com, hugh@veritas.com, joern@lazybastard.org To: Christoph Lameter Return-path: Received: from relay1.sgi.com ([192.48.171.29]:47489 "EHLO relay.sgi.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753112AbXK2EUV (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:20:21 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 08:15:26PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, David Chinner wrote: > > > I don't think that gives the same return value. The return value > > is supposed to be clamped at a maximum of page_cache_size(mapping). > > Ok. So this? Looks good. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner Principal Engineer SGI Australian Software Group