From: Vitaliy Gusev <vgusev-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org>
To: "Serge E. Hallyn" <serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: "J. Bruce Fields"
<bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>,
linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Linux Containers
<containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul-3ImXcnM4P+0@public.gmane.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Pid namespaces vs locks interaction
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 20:42:41 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <200712122042.41990.vgusev@openvz.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20071212173115.GA21956-6s5zFf/epYLPQpwDFJZrxKsjOiXwFzmk@public.gmane.org>
On 12 December 2007 20:31:15 Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> Quoting Vitaliy Gusev (vgusev-GEFAQzZX7r8dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org):
> > Hello
> >
> > On 6 December 2007 18:51:30 Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> > > > fl_pid is used by nfs, fuse and gfs2. For instance nfs keeps in
> > > > fl_pid some unique id to identify locking process between hosts - it
> > > > is not a process pid.
> > >
> > > Ok, but so the struct user_flock->fl_pid is being set to the task's
> > > virtual pid, while the struct kernel_flock->fl_pid is being set to
> > > task->tgid for nfsd use.
> > >
> > > Why can't nfs just generate a uniqueid from the struct pid when it
> > > needs it?
> >
> > I think it is hard. lockd uses struct nlm_host to get process unique id
> > (see __nlm_alloc_pid() function).
>
> Looks pretty simple though... That whole set of code could even stay
> the same except for in __nlm_alloc_pid():
>
> option 1: compare struct pid* instead of uint32_t pid
> option 2: use the "global pid" out of the stored struct pid,
> something like pid->numbers[0].nr.
We can't use process pid. Process pid is circulated! NFS (lockd) needs
unique process id between hosts which can't repeat oneself.
>
> > > Fuse just seems to copy the pid to report it to userspace, so it would
> > > just copy pid_vnr(kernel_flock->pid) into user_flock->fl_pid.
> > >
> > > Anyway I haven't looked at all the uses of struct fl_pid, but you
> > > can always get the pidnr back from the struct pid if needed so there
> > > should be no problem.
> > >
> > > The split definately seems worthwhile to me, so that
> > > user_flock->fl_pidnr can always be said to be the pid in the acting
> > > process' namespace, and flock->fl_pid can always be a struct pid,
> > > rather than having fl_pid sometimes be current->tgid, or sometimes
> > > pid_vnr(flock->fl_nspid)...
> > >
> > > -serge
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > > linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> > > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >
> > --
> > Thank,
> > Vitaliy Gusev
>
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
Thank,
Vitaliy Gusev
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-12-12 17:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200712061411.32159.vgusev@openvz.org>
2007-12-06 12:57 ` [RFC][PATCH] Pid namespaces vs locks interaction Vitaliy Gusev
2007-12-06 14:53 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-12-06 15:19 ` Vitaliy Gusev
2007-12-06 15:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-12-08 22:21 ` Brad Boyer
[not found] ` <20071206155130.GA12463-6s5zFf/epYLPQpwDFJZrxKsjOiXwFzmk@public.gmane.org>
2007-12-12 16:07 ` Vitaliy Gusev
2007-12-12 17:31 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20071212173115.GA21956-6s5zFf/epYLPQpwDFJZrxKsjOiXwFzmk@public.gmane.org>
2007-12-12 17:42 ` Vitaliy Gusev [this message]
2007-12-12 18:42 ` Serge E. Hallyn
[not found] ` <20071212184225.GA23504-6s5zFf/epYLPQpwDFJZrxKsjOiXwFzmk@public.gmane.org>
2007-12-13 14:13 ` Vitaliy Gusev
2007-12-13 16:40 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-12-06 22:15 ` J. Bruce Fields
2007-12-07 14:51 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-12-21 12:22 ` [PATCH] " Vitaliy Gusev
2007-12-21 14:42 ` Serge E. Hallyn
2007-12-22 0:50 ` Andrew Morton
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=200712122042.41990.vgusev@openvz.org \
--to=vgusev-gefaqzzx7r8dnm+yrofe0a@public.gmane.org \
--cc=bfields-uC3wQj2KruNg9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org \
--cc=containers-qjLDD68F18O7TbgM5vRIOg@public.gmane.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=serue-r/Jw6+rmf7HQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=xemul-3ImXcnM4P+0@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).