From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFD] Incremental fsck
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:41:06 -0500
Message-ID: <20080108164106.735c431d@bree.surriel.com>
References: <200801090022.55589.a1426z@gawab.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
To: Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com>
Return-path: <linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([66.187.233.31]:55001 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1750830AbYAHVlM (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 8 Jan 2008 16:41:12 -0500
In-Reply-To: <200801090022.55589.a1426z@gawab.com>
Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org>

On Wed, 9 Jan 2008 00:22:55 +0300
Al Boldi <a1426z@gawab.com> wrote:

> Has there been some thought about an incremental fsck?
> 
> You know, somehow fencing a sub-dir to do an online fsck?

Search for "chunkfs"

-- 
All rights reversed.