From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "J. Bruce Fields" Subject: Re: Leak in nlmsvc_testlock for async GETFL case Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:42:07 -0500 Message-ID: <20080115144207.GA10971@fieldses.org> References: <48611B2F-1587-48C5-9F30-8DCFA1121CF6@Sun.COM> <20071129190848.GA17907@fieldses.org> <71BCABE5-52AD-4573-8DC0-5C57152A397B@Sun.COM> <20080114204419.GD16926@fieldses.org> <20080115042605.GT18741@parisc-linux.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Oleg Drokin , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org To: Matthew Wilcox Return-path: Received: from mail.fieldses.org ([66.93.2.214]:37948 "EHLO fieldses.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750733AbYAOOmP (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Jan 2008 09:42:15 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080115042605.GT18741@parisc-linux.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 09:26:06PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 03:44:19PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: > > Thanks! I've queued it up for 2.6.25. > > Hi Bruce, > > I haven't had as much time to play with de-BKL-ising fs/locks.c as I > would like, so fixing that for 2.6.25 is probably out of the question, > but here are two janitorial patches that hopefully can be applied and > will make the next steps easier. They make sense all by themselves, > even if I don't get back to this project for a few months. OK, thanks. Hopefully we will get back to this--it'll be nice to finally make progress on it. --b.