From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH] [8/18] BKL-removal: Remove BKL from remote_llseek Date: Mon, 28 Jan 2008 03:44:31 +0100 Message-ID: <200801280344.32053.ak@suse.de> References: <20080127317.043953000@suse.de> <1201456562.7346.13.camel@heimdal.trondhjem.org> <524f69650801271418s16f88928xc58dcbe9f5ede9e4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Trond Myklebust" , swhiteho@redhat.com, sfrench@samba.org, vandrove@vc.cvut.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, akpm@osdl.org To: "Steve French" Return-path: Received: from mx1.suse.de ([195.135.220.2]:41324 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752652AbYA1Cof (ORCPT ); Sun, 27 Jan 2008 21:44:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <524f69650801271418s16f88928xc58dcbe9f5ede9e4@mail.gmail.com> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sunday 27 January 2008 23:18:26 Steve French wrote: > If two seeks overlap, can't you end up with an f_pos value that is > different than what either thread seeked to? Yes you can on 32bit. Especially during the 4GB wrap -Andi